Re: IC lost after changing to a 100Meg Network ~ Switcher problem?
- From: "JVC Dude" <wilkinsons.hifi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:28:18 +0100
Thanks to your suggestion.... of removing the extra default gateway....IT
WORKS !
I'm ok with using the proxy server.. indeed it is a little difficult to
access the router since it's not mine.... we share the broadband connection
from the computer shop across the road..... although I do have the logon
details and can try to setup a route... Thanks for that also...I wasn't
aware that I could get my network to the router like that.
Isn't it 'safer' for my network being behind the proxy server (or Wingate
with its basic firewall) than directly connected to 'their' network?
Cheers
Andrew
"Doug Sherman [MVP]" <dsherman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:#2cejuSbFHA.3488@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> If you are not going to use a proxy server, then routing must be enabled
on
> the 2 NIC machine. And you must configure a static route on the broadband
> router:
>
> route add 192.168.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.99
>
> You will have to consult your manual in order to determine how to do this
on
> your router. You want a route to the 192.168.1.x network which points to
> 192.168.0.99.
>
> Doug Sherman
> MCSE, MCSA, MCP+I, MVP
>
> "JVC Dude" <wilkinsons.hifi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:42a7f5f4$0$41931$ed2619ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Thanks for the reply..
> > I'll check/remove the 1.1's default gateway setting....
> > As for the proxy server... I was originally using Wingate... and have
> > uninstalled/re installed it a couple of times... and out of desperation
> > tried CCproxy as an alternative with the same effect.
> >
> > Interestingly, with no proxy server set up the problem is still there
when
> > the card is enabled... I think I may have to try another card...
> >
> > Thanks Andrew
> >
> > "Doug Sherman [MVP]" <dsherman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:ewh9zoDbFHA.2380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Some proxy servers use the MAC address or other identifier rather than
> the
> > > IP address to determine the interface on which they will respond.
Since
> > you
> > > have changed this interface, try reconfiguring or reinstalling the
proxy
> > > server.
> > >
> > > Also: "Default gateways etc are all set to look to 192.168.0.1"
> > >
> > > The only default gateway which should be set to 192.168.0.1 is the one
> for
> > > the 192.168.0.99 NIC. The 192.168.1.1 NIC should have no default
> gateway;
> > > and the other machines should all have 192.168.1.1 as a default
gateway.
> > >
> > > Doug Sherman
> > > MCSE, MCSA, MCP+I, MVP
> > >
> > >
> > > "JVC Dude" <wilkinsons.hifi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > news:42a6e3fb$0$32627$ed2619ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > ~I have a shared internet connection, coming in by Wifi to a W-NIC
on
> 1
> > PC
> > > > (setup as 192.168.0.99) served by a broadband router (192.168.0.1).
> > > >
> > > > A second card (192.168.1.1) in the machine connects to my other
> > networked
> > > > machines ~(all basic XP) all with addresses 192.168.1.x. I am usng
a
> > > proxy
> > > > server program to feed the internet to all machines.. The
original
> > > > network card was a10Meg connected to a 10 Meg switcher running the
> > > network.
> > > > All ran ok using the WIFI link as a gateway.
> > > > I changed the switcher to 100Meg. All seemed ok...
> > > > I fitted an SIS 900 100Meg NIC , to speed up my network.
> > > >
> > > > The internet is now no longer available to any machine. Network
> traffic
> > > can
> > > > be seen 'searching' MY network when it should be searching the WIFI
> > > network.
> > > >
> > > > Default gateways etc are all set to look to 192.168.0.1, but the SIS
> > card
> > > > seems to make all traffic go through it.
> > > > You can ping the router ( & all other machines)
> > > > Disabling the card (my network) restores the internet to the main
> > machine.
> > > > Same 2 NICs fitted into another XP machine give the same result- so
> I've
> > > > narrowed it down to the switcher/SIS900 card, or possibly some
> mismatch
> > > with
> > > > the switcher, but there's nothing I can see to alter..
> > > >
> > > > Could a switcher be trying to act as some sort of gateway?
> > > > What am I missing?
> > > > cheers AW
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IC lost after changing to a 100Meg Network ~ Switcher problem?
- From: Doug Sherman [MVP]
- Re: IC lost after changing to a 100Meg Network ~ Switcher problem?
- References:
- IC lost after changing to a 100Meg Network ~ Switcher problem?
- From: JVC Dude
- Re: IC lost after changing to a 100Meg Network ~ Switcher problem?
- From: Doug Sherman [MVP]
- Re: IC lost after changing to a 100Meg Network ~ Switcher problem?
- From: JVC Dude
- Re: IC lost after changing to a 100Meg Network ~ Switcher problem?
- From: Doug Sherman [MVP]
- IC lost after changing to a 100Meg Network ~ Switcher problem?
- Prev by Date: "Sponsored links"; self-installing trash etc.
- Next by Date: Re: "Sponsored links"; self-installing trash etc.
- Previous by thread: Re: IC lost after changing to a 100Meg Network ~ Switcher problem?
- Next by thread: Re: IC lost after changing to a 100Meg Network ~ Switcher problem?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|