Re: Router & Firewall?
From: Richard G. Harper (rgharper_at_email.com)
Date: 07/06/04
- Next message: matt: "network causing crash?"
- Previous message: Mark Corbelli: "Re: IP addresses"
- In reply to: David Angelovich: "Re: Router & Firewall?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 06:58:47 -0400
Glad to be able to help.
-- Richard G. Harper [MVP Win9x] rgharper@email.com * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups * for the benefit of all. Private mail is usually not replied to. * HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm "David Angelovich" <dangelovich@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:eGM8ZOxYEHA.996@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > I understand now. > Thanks for your help. > > - David Angelovich > > > "Richard G. Harper" <rgharper@email.com> wrote in message > news:uC607xuYEHA.2812@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > I can't say it would be "terribly" unwise, if you practice safe computing > > habits the combination of NAT plus XP's firewall is probably plenty of > > protection. But if you're in the habit of opening unexpected attachments > > and/or surfing sites whose pedigree you don't know for sure then you may > > wish to consider added protection. > > > > -- > > Richard G. Harper [MVP Win9x] rgharper@email.com > > * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups > > * for the benefit of all. Private mail is usually not replied to. > > * HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm > > > > > > "David Angelovich" <dangelovich@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:eWIqvVkYEHA.4068@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > > Suppose I were to not install a firewall of any kind (or maybe just > leave > > > the XP one on), and port forwarding were disabled... > > > Would that be terribly unwise? > > > > > > > > > "Richard G. Harper" <rgharper@email.com> wrote in message > > > news:ecXlxHkYEHA.2456@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > > > Ah ... that's different. :-) > > > > > > > > NAT provides a fair amount of protection for the computers behind the > > > > router. In theory the presence of NAT means that the computer(s) > behind > > > the > > > > router are invisible to the Internet. In practice this may depend on > > the > > > > configuration of the router, especially if it's forwarding ports to > any > > PC > > > > inside the NAT barrier. > > > > > > > > Adding a firewall to the network setup will provide further > protection - > > > or > > > > at least alert you if unwanted traffic is getting to your PC. If you > > add > > > a > > > > third-party firewall (as opposed to the built-in XP firewall) you will > > get > > > > both incoming and outgoing alerts and protection - which could come in > > > handy > > > > if you have let something inside that's establishing a connection you > > > don't > > > > want to the outside world. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Richard G. Harper [MVP Win9x] rgharper@email.com > > > > * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups > > > > * for the benefit of all. Private mail is usually not replied to. > > > > * HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > "David Angelovich" <dangelovich@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > > news:OZuYYYjYEHA.712@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > > > > Sorry, what I meant was it has built-in Router.... not firewall.... > i > > > > typed > > > > > the wrong thing..... > > > > > > > > > > - David Angelovich > > > > > > > > > > "Richard G. Harper" <rgharper@email.com> wrote in message > > > > > news:uYwYmIjYEHA.4004@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > > > > > If your DSL modem contains a firewall, that is a "hardware" > > firewall. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Richard G. Harper [MVP Win9x] rgharper@email.com > > > > > > * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups > > > > > > * for the benefit of all. Private mail is usually not replied to. > > > > > > * HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "David Angelovich" <dangelovich@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > news:eqzB6diYEHA.1656@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've got a DSL modem (with built in firewall) running on my > > network > > > > with > > > > > > > NAT.... > > > > > > > Should I also have a hardware firewall? > > > > > > > Someone told me that NAT and the router's capabilities act as a > > > > firewall > > > > > > > anyway..... Is this true? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - David Angelovich > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Next message: matt: "network causing crash?"
- Previous message: Mark Corbelli: "Re: IP addresses"
- In reply to: David Angelovich: "Re: Router & Firewall?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|