Re: More than 10 simultaneous connection
From: Ron Martell (ron_at_onlinehelp.bc.ca)
Date: 03/27/04
- Next message: Matt DuBois [MSFT]: "Re: DHCP Problem causing ip to be 169.X.X.X and not 192.168.X.X"
- Previous message: Tom N: "net send"
- In reply to: Bob: "Re: More than 10 simultaneous connection"
- Next in thread: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "More than 10 simultaneous connection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 00:39:03 GMT
"Bob" <bobc@onecomputerguy.com> wrote:
>Win98 doesn't have that limit. Have many customers that can't afford a
>server OS that don't need much more than a file cabinet for storing files.
>This works fine.
>
Wrong. Windows 95/98/Me/2000 all have the same 10 connection limit.
Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
-- Microsoft MVP On-Line Help Computer Service http://onlinehelp.bc.ca "The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much."
- Next message: Matt DuBois [MSFT]: "Re: DHCP Problem causing ip to be 169.X.X.X and not 192.168.X.X"
- Previous message: Tom N: "net send"
- In reply to: Bob: "Re: More than 10 simultaneous connection"
- Next in thread: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "More than 10 simultaneous connection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
