Re: Maximum number of users on XP Home Network

From: Eric Cross (encross_at_eudoramail.com)
Date: 03/17/04


Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:30:38 -0600

Yes, Steve I know exactly what you are saying. However, in Kevin's post, I
directly was answering his question with the one router he has. He could
simply purchase another hub or switch and add it for more computers.

However, if I'm reading this article correctly, Ad-hoc networking has a
limit up to 9 wireless clients. Is that the limit for Ad-hoc networking?

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/wifisoho.mspx

________________
Eric

"Steve Winograd [MVP]" <winograd@pobox.com> wrote in message
news:5qf620pavh1ak0o78psrleh0s933u8tj8p@4ax.com...
> In article <uP9FHNG7DHA.2300@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>, "Eric Cross"
> <encross@eudoramail.com> wrote:
> >> There's no limit to the number of computers that can network with
> >> Windows XP Home Edition and Professional.
> >
> >There's no limit of computers that can be networked? I really don't see
how
> >that is possible. I would have to say it would depend on the router you
> >have. There are some routers that can only support up to 253 users. If 32
> >wireless connections can be made and 4 ports are present, I would have
say
> >36 users total can be networked.
>
> Yes, some routers have limits, as you say, Eric, and networks using
> those routers are limited by them. However, those limits aren't built
> into Windows XP itself. A 1964 Volkswagen Bus might only be able to
> go 45 MPH up a mountain road, but that doesn't mean that 45 MPH is the
> maximum speed for every car going up that road. :-)
>
> Also, a network using different (or no) routers could have far more
> computers in a subnet. And a network can use NetBEUI or IPX/SPX
> instead of TCP/IP, completely removing subnets from the equation.
> --
> Best Wishes,
> Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking)
>
> Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group
> for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions
> addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups.
>
> Microsoft Most Valuable Professional Program
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Newbie question: is net.inet.ip.fastforwarding intended for routersonly?
    ... To my imagination (I have taken a sight on the kernel networking ... > code), the fastforwarding path is intended for routers only, so if I want ... * ip_fastforward gets its speed from processing the forwarded packet to ...
    (freebsd-net)
  • Re: mce not working with dsl modem
    ... gone in and created a new network connection to access my Verizon DSL ... WEP and WPA are two security schemes used in wireless local area networking. ... WPA (Wireless Protected Access) is newer and more secure, although I understand that it is hackable too. ... Some routers can spoof that address to solve this problem. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter)
  • Re: No internet gateway.
    ... Some switches or routers may not ... Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on ... will not pull a gateway address from the provider. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing)
  • Re: No internet gateway.
    ... Some switches or routers may not ... Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on ... will not pull a gateway address from the provider. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing)
  • Re: Network Name vs Workgroup
    ... Steve, I should be more knowledgeable on the subject of LANS having networked two computers back to Win95. ... Having two computers connected has been my security blanket for years, backing up to the second nightly and therefore not wondering where I was going to read my floppy, diskette or CD, if one of my computers failed. ... Knowledge Base, newsgroups, forums, and networking web sites say. ... Workgroup names serve no practical purpose in XP and Vista. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing)