Re: how come lots of small files transfer slower than 1 big one?

From: James (See.My.Sig_at_The.Bottom.com)
Date: 02/03/04


Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 10:35:46 -0800

both computers are pretty new i think they should be able to support
transfering files just fine with their hardware. im guessing either a NIC
settting is the case here or a bad NIC. this NIC im using is the onboard one
that came with this msi 865PE neo-2 ls motherboard. any nic hardware
settings u can think of that would cause this?

"Bob Willard" <BobwBSGS@TrashThis.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:uO%238h3d6DHA.1936@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> James wrote:
> > what things could be differn't. both are clean installs of xp sp1
> >
> >
> > "Bob Willard" <BobwBSGS@TrashThis.comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:uEr$Udc6DHA.2044@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >
> >>James wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>but lots of files tranfer fast when i use another workstation to the
> >
> > same
> >
> >>>server.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>"Bob Willard" <BobwBSGS@TrashThis.comcast.net> wrote in message
> >>>news:OY0pCNB6DHA.2064@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>James wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>how come my transfers are so slow when copying files from my xp
machine
> >>>
> >>>to
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>my win2k machine on my 100mbps switched lan?
> >>>>>large file = 100MB .mdb
> >>>>>small files = total 7MB's of 400 text files
> >>>>>
> >>>>>it takes 12 mins to transfer the 7 MB's and only 30 seconds to
transfer
> >>>
> >>>the
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>large file.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>And how come digging a ditch with one backhoe is faster than using
> >>>>ten men with shovels? Or using a thousand men with teaspoons?
> >>>>
> >>>>Files are transferred one at a time. For each file, the source PC
must
> >>>>look up the file's metadata (to translate the file name to the file
> >>>>location, check security params, etc.). Worse still, is what the
target
> >>>>PC must do for each file: it must find some unused space on the HD,
then
> >>>>allocate some of that space, then create the metadata for the new
file,
> >>>>then ask the source PC for the data, then copy the data to the
allocated
> >>>>space, then update the metadata (when all data has been copied), then
> >>>>notify the source PC that the copy is done.
> >>>>
> >>>>It takes a lot of work to copy a file across a net, whether the file
is
> >>>>tiny or huge. For a huge file, copying data take most of the time;
for
> >
> > a
> >
> >>>>tiny file, copying data takes far less time than all of the other
> >
> > overhead
> >
> >>>>work.
> >>>>--
> >>>>Cheers, Bob
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> From your question, I assumed that you were interested in why bunches
> >>of files take longer than a single file to transfer; that is the issue
> >>I addressed. If you want to understand why one PC is faster than
another,
> >>then you should conduct some measurements in which only one variable at
> >>a time is changed -- and "the workstation" is not one variable, it is
> >>probably many.
> >>--
> >>Cheers, Bob
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
> NIC speed, RWIN, protocols used, DNS settings, HD speed, CPU frequency,
> IDE speed, RAM speed and quantity, pagefile min/max params and HD(s),
> XP PRO v. HE, NTFS v. FAT32, user credentials, other traffic on the LAN,
> HD RPM, HD fragmentation, CPU type, cache params, MB type/revision, BIOS
> type, version, and settings, NIC vendor/model, NIC card v. chip,
concurrent
> apps running, domain v. workgroup, etc.
>
> And, maybe, lots of other stuff. It takes care and effort to compare two
> things that are *exactly* alike except for one variable.
> --
> Cheers, Bob
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: clearcommerror native exception?
    ... Thanks again for your posts. ... I am trying to talk to several different pieces of hardware via pocket pc's ... I thought it may have been parity error so I tried the setup for parity none, ... This means there is something wrong with my settings but why didn't ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.compactframework)
  • Re: FC3 psychotic behavior
    ... On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 22:27 -0400, Marc M wrote: ... I've suffered the same problem before, with it randomly whizzing around ... using Windows on the same hardware, ... settings, so I don't think I've set anything badly. ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: get max out of computer
    ... than their settings were meant to allow. ... going to ruin your hardware by doing so. ... DDR RAM (PC2700 as the board doesn't support the 400 MHz RAM oddly - or so ... you're going to ruin a lot of good hardware probably. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain)
  • Re: Is there runtimefiles missing at the client?
    ... No, it's nothing with hardware.. ... On the 3 comouers with visual Studio I have tested... ... > Strange problem, however in the way you tell it, does it not look in my ... > course as well look in the settings. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
  • How to save add-ins settings?
    ... I know I can put my .dot's in the Word Startup folder to guaranty it ... but I don't want to have to keep transfering files from one ... How do I get Word to remember my settings? ... remembers its 'default' selection. ...
    (microsoft.public.word.application.errors)