Re: Best codec to use for reliability
- From: "RalfG" <itsnotme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:35:55 -0400
Windows Media Video and Windows Media Audio, version 9 most likely. As far
as I know there is no option to use anything else to encode with in WMM
except output to DV-AVI which also uses specific non-selectable codecs.
Every time you re-encode your video (ie. Raw->DivX, DivX->WMV) you degrade
the quality of the video. If you still want to work in other formats XviD is
a suitable alternative to DivX. There is also h264 which is reputed to be
better quality than either of them.
"downphoenix" <downphoenix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3F6BAA7D-436E-41C9-AC84-413FECF3AF1D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
and which codec(s) are those, exactly?
Im wanting to import into movie maker, rather than capture w/ movie maker,
so that's why Im asking.
"RalfG" wrote:
Why not just use the Windows Media codecs that WMM uses anyway?
"downphoenix" <downphoenix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:84B0B030-81FE-433F-8EE0-82940D769DDD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Im just wondering what the best format to encode into is.
I plan on doing low compression formats or maybe raw data, for the
actual
recording sessions, but for editing, I want to cut it down to a high
compression format.
I've tried DivX, but for some reason, Movie Maker seems to have a LOT
of
problems with that. Is there a way to either get DivX to co-operate, or
is
there a similarly size-reduced codec that could allow me to make a
pretty
decent length movie, that could say, fit Youtube's 10minute 100MB rule.
Thanks.
.
- References:
- Re: Best codec to use for reliability
- From: RalfG
- Re: Best codec to use for reliability
- Prev by Date: OxOODIB83
- Next by Date: Re: Best codec to use for reliability
- Previous by thread: Re: Best codec to use for reliability
- Next by thread: Re: Best codec to use for reliability
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
