Re: Newsletter

From: PapaJohn \(MVP\) (PapaJohn_at_CharterMI.net)
Date: 05/19/04


Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 18:33:19 -0400

One paragraph in John's post needs a comment:

"Mind you PAPAJOHN did once post a message in here stating that no one ran
the newsgroup...he then followed that up by sending me an email stating
that we could not BOTH run the newsgroup...that was just after the other
remark about how he must be right because he posts to those 52 newsgroups
What kind of guy is this.....obviously one who has grown much to accustomed
to not being asked specifics or to justify his remarks. Instead he relies
on people just like you...sad really don't you think?"

I have all of the email correspondence between us.... I reviewed them and think a Dec 14 email from me to him is the only one that he could be referring to, as I mention us posting to the newsgroup.

If anyone cares enough to see what the email exchange says, I'd be more than happy to provide a full unedited copy.... just send me a private email and I'll email a copy. I don't consider it private anymore, and won't say if anyone asked or who.... hopefully no one cares about these issues and I won't be asked. I thought of posting it to the newsgroup, but my only reason for posting is to help provide peer support to Movie Maker users.

-- 
PapaJohn
Movie Maker 2 - www.papajohn.org
Photo Story 2 - www.photostory.papajohn.org
.
"John Kelly" <hidden@hide.away> wrote in message news:ZCQpc.1598$YC3.17883322@news-text.cableinet.net...
> Hello mr scared...hiding behind an anonymous label, with no guts to stand up
> and be identified.....silly little boy.
> 
> The USENET rules states that unless the rules of any particular Usenet
> group allows it, all messages will be plain text. Are you intelligent
> enough or knowledge enough to have a guess why that might be?
> 
> Be assured of this, Every time PAPAJOHN makes a statement that is
> demonstratably wrong I will make sure the person he has given that advise
> to is put right. Every time PAPAJOHN makes a statement along the lines of
> !I post to 52 newsgroups" I will point out to every one how valid that
> remark is. His latest stupid remark refers to the effects of a fragmented
> hard drive on a computers ability to create an output file...he was asked
> to be specific, but as usual once his generalized non specific answers are
> test he shuts up. Every time an idiot stands up to defend those
> inaccuracies in public I will return the favor as I am doing now.
> 
> Perhaps you would like to enlighten us all and point out where I have made
> a threat.????
> 
> There is no appointed moderator for this newsgroup...there is simply a guy
> who makes offers and then withdraws them but does not have the guts to say
> so. This newsgroup exists because the rules of Usenet say so...and to be
> carried along with all other newsgroups it has to comply with the rules.
> Every time PAPAJOHN puts users at risk by posting with HTML code I will
> make a point of posting and telling him and others that he is again
> breaking the rules.
> 
> Mind you PAPAJOHN did once post a message in here stating that no one ran
> the newsgroup...he then followed that up by sending me an email stating
> that we could not BOTH run the newsgroup...that was just after the other
> remark about how he must be right because he posts to those 52 newsgroups
> What kind of guy is this.....obviously one who has grown much to accustomed
> to not being asked specifics or to justify his remarks. Instead he relies
> on people just like you...sad really don't you think?
> 
> Every time some one attempts to defend his ridiculous remarks, I will post
> all of the reasons why they are misguided. If you want me to stop pointing
> out all of these things stop doing so yourself and I will restict my
> remarks where possible to his latest inaccurate remark, there are so many
> nowadays......
> 
> I like you tone and style of expression by the way, do tell, where did you
> manage to perfect it so?
> 
> -- 
> Best Wishes.....John Kelly
> www.the-kellys.org
> www.the-kellys.co.uk
> All material gained from other sources is duly acknowledged. No Value is
> obtained by publishing in any format other peoples work 


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Problem with viewing video in Timeline but views fine in Collection Field
    ... > I hope this person for this one remark alone looses his status as an MVP. ... I wonder how they will try and justify to themselves the reason ... I set it the task of finding these 52 newsgroups. ... Brown came back and slapped the bully boys down....Bully Boys that are MVP's ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.moviemaker)
  • Re: Google Groups Beta Terms of Use
    ... >>> It is google who runs the newsgroups and as for your childish ... >>> remark, I will ignore it. ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Dewetron Plugins
    ... Shawn B. wrote: ... stating an observation. ... While my remark might have looked like it, ... Chad Z. Hower ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: USB interface
    ... stands in contrast to the SNR common in newsgroups. ... Your remark, however, does not. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Keep the home fires burning
    ... > And now we know what your favorite newsgroups are! ... No, not mine, "last visited groups" is a global tracking. ... after your remark and it gives some idea what the interests of their ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware)

Loading