Re: Newsletter

From: John Kelly (nospam_at_no.spam)
Date: 05/17/04 

Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 20:56:40 GMT

Hello,

    Why this newsgroup exists is not really relevant..see other post by me
where Microsoft themselves say it belongs to USENET. But whoever made this
newsgroup its irrelevant. What is relevant is the dangerous practise of
posting messages that can carry a virus or worm and remembering how little
the users in here know, the simple act of viewing that message can cause
damage to their machine....it is my aim to continue making that important
statement so that if that sad day ever comes around...we can point a finger
at the one man who claims to be a professional but never acts like one...you
will see in a minute he does not know how to use the most basic of tools
Outlook Express, by his own admissions.....plus other items....Do Read On.

    Thank you for reinforcing the argument that papajohns actions make it
possible to transfer a virus...he has no idea how to use outlook of
course.....he told me that he could not reply to my email because it was
digitally signed...he did that in such a way and in public so as to make me
look silly...he was relying on his own authority which time after time falls
a long way below the level I would expect an MVP to have...when I told him
all he had to do was press a little button, in simply non abusive terms all
I got was nothing at all...but he then went on to claim he was safe because
he sits behind a router...then when his website went down and people
complained I tried to help out this PROFESSIONAL by giving him the results
of a TRACERT.

    This tracer clearly showed where the problem was...BUT, this
PROFESSIONAL instead again tried to make me look stupid by telling everyone
that the result he got was a load of zero's and that TRACER were clearly of
no use in today's world...so I politely told him his TRACERT had simply
bounced off his own router and that the TRACERT is the first port of call
and is a de-facto standard within the industry....what did I get in
return....a message telling me that there cannot be two people running this
newsgroup and a public message in here where he claimed that he was very
experienced and posted to no less than 52 distinct newsgroups, and that NO
PERSON runs this news group. I checked via multiple servers going back three
years (My software will scan all of them and make just one interest group)
52 Newsgroup Ha! 6 or 7 maybe...I have them all archived including those
containing his grandiose statements. I even checked all of those web site
forums he claims to post too.....Hmmmmm

    I do not know why you think I would take exception to anything you said
here...but I do thank you for giving me the ability to demonstrate to as
many people as possible that he is a danger to everyone, he talks in
generalities that he can not back up with fact ( an even uses comments like,
"I like things that fix themselves" , yes really) He uses other peoples
knowledge and passes it off as his own (All you have to do is remove all
comments where he has included the posters name and then take substantial
chunks of what is left and search all the messages in this newsgroup...you
will find the original poster...I feature a number of times when you do
that)

    I see no reason for you to hide behind an anonymous name...as far as I
can tell you have not tried to twist anything to suit your objective, and as
luck would have it your statements support exactly what I am trying to get
others to realise...of course some of those others have their own agenda,
don't they?

John Kelly
www.the-kellys.org
www.the-kellys.co.uk

"Your Display Name" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:EC14B278-3371-4DB3-A1A2-2C38186D9D94@microsoft.com...
> This groups exists because Microsoft created it on their publicly
accessible NNTP servers, not because "the rules of Usenet say so".
>
> PapaJohn's recent message was actually a MIME multipart/alternative
message, plain HTML. This makes it easy for anyone who feels they are at
risk by reading a HTML message to read the text/plain portion instead
(Outlook Express can easily be configured to do so). However, you're
probably better off encouraging everybody to download the latest patches
from http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com rather than periodically ranting
about HTML messages.
>
> Unfortunately, I feel that I must "hide" behind an anonymous address to
avoid the brunt of your wrath.
>
> ----- John Kelly wrote: -----
>
> Hello mr scared...hiding behind an anonymous label, with no guts to
stand up
> and be identified.....silly little boy.
>
> The USENET rules states that unless the rules of any particular
Usenet
> group allows it, all messages will be plain text. Are you intelligent
> enough or knowledge enough to have a guess why that might be?
>
> Be assured of this, Every time PAPAJOHN makes a statement that is
> demonstratably wrong I will make sure the person he has given that
advise
> to is put right. Every time PAPAJOHN makes a statement along the
lines of
> !I post to 52 newsgroups" I will point out to every one how valid
that
> remark is. His latest stupid remark refers to the effects of a
fragmented
> hard drive on a computers ability to create an output file...he was
asked
> to be specific, but as usual once his generalized non specific
answers are
> test he shuts up. Every time an idiot stands up to defend those
> inaccuracies in public I will return the favor as I am doing now.
>
> Perhaps you would like to enlighten us all and point out where I have
made
> a threat.????
>
> There is no appointed moderator for this newsgroup...there is simply
a guy
> who makes offers and then withdraws them but does not have the guts
to say
> so. This newsgroup exists because the rules of Usenet say so...and to
be
> carried along with all other newsgroups it has to comply with the
rules.
> Every time PAPAJOHN puts users at risk by posting with HTML code I
will
> make a point of posting and telling him and others that he is again
> breaking the rules.
>
> Mind you PAPAJOHN did once post a message in here stating that no one
ran
> the newsgroup...he then followed that up by sending me an email
stating
> that we could not BOTH run the newsgroup...that was just after the
other
> remark about how he must be right because he posts to those 52
newsgroups
> What kind of guy is this.....obviously one who has grown much to
accustomed
> to not being asked specifics or to justify his remarks. Instead he
relies
> on people just like you...sad really don't you think?
>
> Every time some one attempts to defend his ridiculous remarks, I will
post
> all of the reasons why they are misguided. If you want me to stop
pointing
> out all of these things stop doing so yourself and I will restict my
> remarks where possible to his latest inaccurate remark, there are so
many
> nowadays......
>
> I like you tone and style of expression by the way, do tell, where
did you
> manage to perfect it so?
>
> --
> Best Wishes.....John Kelly
> www.the-kellys.org
> www.the-kellys.co.uk
> All material gained from other sources is duly acknowledged. No Value
is
> obtained by publishing in any format other peoples work
>