Re: MS Messenger vs Live Messenger
- From: "Jonathan Kay [MVP]" <msnewsreplies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:44:21 -0400
Greetings,
Live Messenger is more demanding than Windows Messenger ever was. However, unless you're a
really heavy Messenger user (tons of conversation windows, etc.) it shouldn't really be that
noticeable to overall performance on a standard modern PC made this decade.
--
Jonathan Kay
Microsoft MVP - Windows Live Messenger/MSN Messenger/Windows Messenger
Associate Expert
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/
Messenger Resources - http://messenger.jonathankay.com
All posts unless otherwise specified are (c) 2007 Jonathan Kay.
You *must* contact me for redistribution rights.
--
"GMcHale" <GMcHale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6C00B9F8-A8E3-4ED9-B581-7031846C4B47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I've been asked to install the new Messenger by a user, however, I'm
concerned with the performance impact to our system. IS the Live Messenger
better or worst than MS Messenger on using system resources?
I'm reluctant to install.
Thanks
.
- Prev by Date: Re: xml files
- Next by Date: Re: Does MSN Messenger support SSL connectivity?
- Previous by thread: Re: xml files
- Next by thread: Re: Does MSN Messenger support SSL connectivity?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|