Re: Participant removed from conversation due to inactivity
- From: "davewilliamson55555@xxxxxxxxxxx" <davewilliamson55555@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Jan 2007 14:48:16 -0800
How hard can it be to put in an option that says don't timeout
conversations or timeout after 86400 seconds. My guess is this is a
server side resource decision. I guess all I can reply with is "That
is just WONDERFUL".
Thanks for the hint on the ping api ... one day when time permits I'll
do some looking around.
.
- References:
- Participant removed from conversation due to inactivity
- From: davewilliamson55555@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Participant removed from conversation due to inactivity
- From: Jonathan Kay [MVP]
- Participant removed from conversation due to inactivity
- Prev by Date: attn: hamid - truly astonishing nntp groups - ic - (1/1)
- Next by Date: Re: aol or aim messenger problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Participant removed from conversation due to inactivity
- Next by thread: Re: widows live messenger/msn vs windows messenger
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|