Re: Max Bandwidth?

From: "psokolov" <pavel.sokolov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 19 May 2006 05:27:38 -0700

1mbps will be enough for video+audio with very good resolution ( with
good codec of course , like wm9 ).

--
Pavel Sokolov
Instant Messaging for Office
http://www.cezeo.com

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Max Bandwidth?
  - From: Jonathan Kay [MVP]

Prev by Date: Re: whiteboard disconnects
Next by Date: Re: is it possible to send message to an IPaddress
Previous by thread: Re: Max Bandwidth?
Next by thread: Re: Max Bandwidth?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: WM9 vs H.264
... >> For streaming video over the internet lets say at a very low bit rate at ... Whereas the WM9 codec which does a nice job but not ... So for the public audience ... The H.264 will be the best solution unless MS has a new codec ...
(microsoft.public.windowsmedia)
Re: WM9 vs H.264
... > For streaming video over the internet lets say at a very low bit rate at ... Whereas the WM9 codec which does a nice job but not ... So for the public audience ... The H.264 will be the best solution unless MS has a new codec ...
(microsoft.public.windowsmedia)
Re: WM9 E vs H.264 E
... > For streaming video over the internet lets say at a very low bit rate at ... Whereas the WM9 codec which does a nice job but not ... So for the public audience ... The H.264 will be the best solution unless MS has a new codec ...
(microsoft.public.windowsmedia.encoder)
Re: WM9 vs H.264
... >the decoding side as your watching video on the player. ... Whereas the WM9 codec which does a nice job but not as ... It's not so bad and I'd expect most machines over 800MHZ to ... The H.264 will be the best solution unless MS has a new codec ...
(microsoft.public.windowsmedia)
WM9 vs H.264
... For streaming video over the internet lets say at a very low bit rate at ... Whereas the WM9 codec which does a nice job but not as ... So for the public audience ... The H.264 will be the best solution unless MS has a new codec ...
(microsoft.public.windowsmedia)