Re: Still need to open lots of ports?
- From: "Jonathan Kay [MVP]" <msnewsreplies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:10:49 -0500
Greetings,
If you use MSN Messenger 7.x, it can use relay servers and therefore you don't have to worry
about ports, however the performance will be disappointing if you rely on these for
connectivity.
But yes, if the router supports UPnP, it will only open the two ports it needs during an
audio/video conversation, automatically forward and when the conversation is over, will
remove them.
--
Jonathan Kay
Microsoft MVP - Windows Messenger/MSN Messenger/Windows Live Messenger
Associate Expert
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/
Messenger Resources - http://messenger.jonathankay.com
All posts unless otherwise specified are (c) 2006 Jonathan Kay.
You *must* contact me for redistribution rights.
--
"CWatters" <colin.watters@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:lctDf.220867$zh.7377959@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I'd like to use messenger between myself and a PC in another country but we
> both have NAT equipped routers/firewalls. Is there a guide on the web that
> explains how to set this up?
>
> Last time I looked at this I recall being told I needed to open 65,000 ports
> in my firewall if I wanted video and audio to work. Is that still the case
> or has anything changed?
>
> One of the routers supports uPnP - does that take care of things at that end
> automatically?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Still need to open lots of ports?
- From: CWatters
- Re: Still need to open lots of ports?
- References:
- Still need to open lots of ports?
- From: CWatters
- Still need to open lots of ports?
- Prev by Date: Still need to open lots of ports?
- Next by Date: Re: SIP Password
- Previous by thread: Still need to open lots of ports?
- Next by thread: Re: Still need to open lots of ports?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|