Re: non uPnP vs. uPnP routers and broken Remote Assistance
From: Gary Dikkema (gary_d$$NO-SPAM%%_at_cdir.ca)
Date: 08/20/04
- Next message: JANET: "CAN'T DOWNLOAD"
- Previous message: Gary Dikkema: "non uPnP vs. uPnP routers and broken Remote Assistance"
- In reply to: Gary Dikkema: "non uPnP vs. uPnP routers and broken Remote Assistance"
- Next in thread: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Net Passport associated user account"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:48:45 -0500
So... now here's something interesting...
If I'm on the SBS2k3 box on each gateway, both routers are uPnP.
Now XP SP2 doesn't quite see things that way.
And if you have VS Guest XP boxes they seem to be directly connected.
Before SP2 this stuff all just worked...
Are we waiting on another service pack again?
Thoughts?
"Gary Dikkema" <gary_d$$NO-SPAM%%@cdir.ca> wrote in message
news:OjEgbZvhEHA.2340@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>
> Hey Jonathan, long time!
>
> Interesting reading about a uPnP port restricted NAT vs. a non uPnP port
> restricted NAT in my case I have 4 gateways to the Internet and on two of
> them I have a couple of MS routers...
>
> The MN-100 comes up as non uPnP and the MN-500 wireless says it's uPnP.
>
> They both have the same firmware. <VBG>
>
> Needless to say, post SP2 Remote Assistance is broken between these two
> systems; both SBS2k3 with XP Pro etc cleints back off them.
>
> Guess I'm scratching my head wondering why one is non and the other router
> is a uPnP.
>
> Any ideas? Firmware or the ISP or ?
>
> TIA.
>
>
>
- Next message: JANET: "CAN'T DOWNLOAD"
- Previous message: Gary Dikkema: "non uPnP vs. uPnP routers and broken Remote Assistance"
- In reply to: Gary Dikkema: "non uPnP vs. uPnP routers and broken Remote Assistance"
- Next in thread: anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com: "Net Passport associated user account"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
