Re: virus protection

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance



Unknown wrote:
Of course that is only YOUR opinion. Norton and Symantec cause more
problems than their worth and that is not an opinion.

lol! Of COURSE it is!

Read these newsgroups. You yourself had problems.
"Twayne" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ejRgSaukJHA.5112@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Leythos wrote:
In article <_Y_ml.14118$as4.11882@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
unknown@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
Why waste your time rechecking when you know for a fact it is the
most troublesome software?

My understanding is that the Current version is nothing like the
previous versions that were terrible resource hogs. I've not
personally tried/installed the latest version, but I've talked with
many people that believe it is a much better product than the prior
versions.

Actually, I see little difference in it, but at the same time have
things pretty reliably and well set up. That said, there probably
is quite an improvement though, because as it was at one time,
they've turned EVERYTHING back on by default.
As much as I like Norton products and what Symantec has been doing
with them, I still think the multi-layered multiple-testing of the
same thing is inefficient. It's OK if others disagree with me; I
just find such things less than desirable. For instance:
They've done a good job of taking care of a previous problem where
their scanning an outgoing e-mail could result in say OE or FF or
whatever thinking the mail was sent, and placing it into the Sent
folder, when in reality, it was never sent. Many programs were
guilty of that same exact thing in fact. And their solution is so
simple it proves the old addage of the "simplest answer is always
the best answer" too. The added bells & whistles are nice too and
much appreciated. Their heuristics scanning even saved me from an
OOPS last week too; I was about to let GAIN in without realizing it,
and guess what? It basically wanted to know why I wanted to allow
such a stupid action on my machine as it was trying to do.
On the other side of the fence, it missed a ...lovgate infection
attempt, which Adaware 8 caught and eradicated, but it turned out to
not be a virus per sae, so I guess I could excuse that one<g>. NO
idea how I got that one, but ... important thing is, it got caught.
Looks like I'm getting careless in my old age.

Anyway, Norton is alive and well at Symantec and IMO moving in the
right direction.

Regards,

Twayne



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: virus protection
    ... previous versions that were terrible resource hogs. ... As much as I like Norton products and what Symantec has been doing ... heuristics scanning even saved me from an OOPS last week too; ... Norton is alive and well at Symantec and IMO moving in the right ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: Norton will not install
    ... > Send that challenge to Symantec, ... >>There are tens of thousands of people using Norton products with no issues ... Don't take kurttrails' rants as anything meaningful. ... >>machine that anyone tries to install it on, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: whats the best virus protection
    ... >I've been using Norton products since back when Peter was actually on the ... I called Symantec Customer Service. ... It turned out to be a call to India from my office in New ... be an international toll call, ...
    (alt.comp.anti-virus)
  • Re: whats the best virus protection
    ... >>I've been using Norton products since back when Peter was actually on the ... I called Symantec Customer Service. ... > It turned out to be a call to India from my office in New ... > be an international toll call, ...
    (alt.comp.anti-virus)