Re: id 51: how to understand devicepath device



You're welcome.

John

ricardo.l wrote:

Thank You, I wouldn't have been able to work it out by myself.
Riccardo

"John John (MVP)" wrote:


WinObj v2.15
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysinternals/systeminformation/winobj.mspx

John

ricardo.l wrote:

When the reading is like this
\device\Harddisk5\D

in a message like

An error was detected on device <device path> during a paging operation. (id 51, source:disk)

I wonder which disk it is, because i've seen also Harddisk0, and from 0 to 5 it's 6 units, whereas I got only five connected.


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: FIRE WALLS
    ... "John John" wrote in message ... IFF you're actually an MVP and not a poser, ... In which case, when the MSBLAST worm came out you were running Windows 9x or if you were running an NT version you weren't connected to the internet, or you manually blocked the opened ports to the worm. ... For the others who aren't so smart they should have outbound protection and outbound notice of what is trying to access the outside world. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)
  • Re: Upgrading XP Home to XP Pro
    ... The only conflict I can see, and John John (MVP) or Ken Blake can correct me then. ... If you have already upgraded to XP Home SP3, and you intend to install XP Pro SP2: ... earlier CD for the upgrade). ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers)
  • Re: Lost Hibernate Tab
    ... There's nothing in the BIOS that specfically references "Standby". ... "John John (MVP)" wrote: ... My PC used to have two mode of power-down; Standby and Hibernate. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.general)
  • Re: Lost Hibernate Tab
    ... "John John (MVP)" wrote: ... My PC used to have two mode of power-down; Standby and Hibernate. ... setup is supposed to add a partition to the disk, but is must run under MSDOS ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.general)
  • Re: Windowds XP
    ... John John (MVP) wrote: ... Bob I wrote: ... never seen nor heard of a post intentionally taken off a MS server merely because there were discussions of or rants about MS. Posts are removed upon the request of the poster if there is a valid reason, if they contain blatant spam, contain excessive profanity, have any reference to porn, could contain dangerous info, etc. MS takes freedom of speech very seriously and does not arbitrarily remove posts just because they are critical of MS. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)