Re: Virtual Memory
No, and No.
"Confused" <Confused@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
Hi
Given that XP uses 32-bit addressing, does that mean that if you have
2GB of RAM you can disable Virtual Memory? If so, is there likely to
be any noticeable boost to performance?
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Virtual Memory
... Given that XP uses 32-bit addressing, does that mean that if you have ... 2GB of RAM you can disable Virtual Memory? ... be any noticeable boost to performance? ... (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support) - RE: Virtual Memory
... Given that XP uses 32-bit addressing, does that mean that if you have ... 2GB of RAM you can disable Virtual Memory? ... (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support) - Virtual Memory
... Given that XP uses 32-bit addressing, does that mean that if you have ... 2GB of RAM you can disable Virtual Memory? ... be any noticeable boost to performance? ... (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support) - Re: 4GB RAM support
... That is true and the only way that 32-bit Windows can see all the RAM is to shift the memory addressing for the hardware above the 4GB boundary and use the /PAE switch with one of the 32-bit Windows version that supports more than 4GB of RAM. ... (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics) - Re: 4GB RAM support
... administrator can reserve 3 GB for user space, thus leaving only 1 GB of ... ability to see 4 gb of RAM. ... 4GB of Memory and the devices are using addressing space within this ... (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics) |
|