Re: CHKDSK: unused index entries and security descriptors.
- From: "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:38:29 -0700
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 00:06:47 +0100, "Gerry" <gerry@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ken
I was passing on this misinformation "I called Symantec, "We don't
support Ghost 7.0 anymore, call Microsoft and get different Restore XP
software"."
Ghost 7.0 is now quite old but it may still be supported notwithstanding
what was said in XP Performance newsgroup today. There are, however, a
number of versions not supported. Symantec are dropping established
programmes with the advent of Vista e.g. Winfax Pro is the latest
casualty. Still my writing off Ghost may be premature. We shall see <G>!
*I* hope you're right. Writing off anything Symantec sounds good to
me.
Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:38:14 +0100, "Gerry" <gerry@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Martin
Unless I have been fed misinformation you may find Ghost is no longer
supported by Symantec!
Gerry, I think you're mistaken. See
http://www.symantec.com/themes/ghost/index.jsp?src=symsug_us
--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
.
- References:
- Re: CHKDSK: unused index entries and security descriptors.
- From: Zoidberg
- Re: CHKDSK: unused index entries and security descriptors.
- From: Gerry
- Re: CHKDSK: unused index entries and security descriptors.
- From: Ken Blake, MVP
- Re: CHKDSK: unused index entries and security descriptors.
- From: Gerry
- Re: CHKDSK: unused index entries and security descriptors.
- Prev by Date: Can't Change Page File in Windows XP
- Next by Date: Re: UNMOUNTABLE_BOOT_VOLUME
- Previous by thread: Re: CHKDSK: unused index entries and security descriptors.
- Next by thread: Re: CHKDSK: unused index entries and security descriptors.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
