Re: disk backup. Efficiency?
- From: "James Silverton" <not.jim.silverton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:15:38 -0500
"Jaymon" <jaymon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:Oqbt6gQWHHA.1036@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.google.com/search?q=semi-automatic+or+even+completely+automatic+schedule+for+backups
Investigate for yourself for the best results as to your particular wants, needs, etc..
Cheers
j;-j
"James Silverton" <not.jim.silverton@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:%23Kn173OWHHA.3500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxLL wrote on Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:27:40 +0100:
L> This includes files folders and everything else.
You raise an interesting question there. IMHO, there are two reasons for backups: to restore accidentally or mistakenly deleted files and to deal with a complete and unexpected hard disc failure. I wonder what would be the minimum and most efficient hard and software for these? I am not able to back up to a network and favor an external USB hard disc for my backup media. It would be interesting to know how best to set up a semi-automatic or even completely automatic schedule. Opinions on software would be welcome and speed is also important to me.
It is amazing how often such replies as "investigate for yourself" arise when one asks for opinions. I thought I had stated my aims :-)
--
James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: disk backup. Efficiency?
- From: Jaymon
- Re: disk backup. Efficiency?
- From: Anna
- Re: disk backup. Efficiency?
- References:
- disk backup
- From: LL
- Re: disk backup. Efficiency?
- From: James Silverton
- Re: disk backup. Efficiency?
- From: Jaymon
- disk backup
- Prev by Date: Re: disk backup. Efficiency?
- Next by Date: Re: WMIdiag, what have I learned
- Previous by thread: Re: disk backup. Efficiency?
- Next by thread: Re: disk backup. Efficiency?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|