Re: upgrade to windows XP
- From: "Richard" <richard1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:15:09 -0400
and also zonealram ( firewall) will not be upgraded for windows 98.
If you watch the Sunday newspaper for sales, you can pickup a wired
router/switch
for about $30. A router/switch also acts as a firewall. Remember, anytime
you can
do something in hardware, it's always better than doing it in software.
IMHO
Richard
"A E" <aeldin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eNkLgrKuGHA.1288@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for the tips. It is working now after I waited 20 minutes. Hardware
is OK. Everything is working fine now. The reason I had to upgrade is
that Microsoft will not provide security patches for windows 98 and also
zonealram ( firewall) will not be upgraded for windows 98.
"Bruce Chambers" <bchambers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23dSwyMKuGHA.5056@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A E wrote:
I have an old PC which was running windows 98 fine. Microsoft stopped
supporting win 98 a month ago. I had to purchase windows xp ( way to go
microsoft) .
Why? Just because Win98 isn't going to be supported any longer (and it
is rather "long in the tooth") doesn't mean that it's going to suddenly
stop working. There was no "need" to upgrade. You upgraded because you
wanted to do so, not because you "had" to do so.
My PC meets the min requirements to run XP, CPU at 300, RAM is 384, Hard
disk is 20 Gig.
By "minimum requirements," Microsoft seems to mean that the OS will
install, but not that the computer will then be of any practical use.
This has been the case for as long as I can remember. (WinNT 4.0 on a 66
MHz 80486Dx CPU? Yes, it installed, but it was a painful thing to use.)
The word "glacial" comes to mind, if the computer doesn't have a CPU of
at least 500 MHz along with at least 256 Mb of RAM. You'll also want a
larger hard drive, if you're going to add any applications to the OS.
Acceptable performance is, of course, a matter of personal opinion
and depends entirely upon what *you* expect to do with your computer. If
all you want to do is play WinXP's built-in games, send and receive
simple emails, browse the Internet (while avoiding the more "ornamental"
web sites) etc., such a machine may well meet your needs. If, however,
you plan to take advantage of WinXP's multimedia capabilities, play
graphic-intensive games, or do advanced word or data processing, such a
machine would probably be woefully inadequate.
If you turn off all of WinXP GUI eye-candy, it will still be very
slow, but it might be usable for simple word processing, email,
web-browsing, etc. It won't be any good for graphics-intensive
applications, and most newer games. (During the public preview period, I
tested WinXP on a 500 MHz machine with 256 Mb of RAM, and it was much
slower than I like.)
To help improve WinXP's performance on older machines:
1) Right-click the Task Bar > Properties > Start Menu, ensure "Classic
Start menu" is selected.
2) Right-click an empty spot on the Desktop > Properties > Themes >
select "Windows Classic."
3) Right-click My Computer > Properties > Performance > Settings >
Visual Effects, ensure "Adjust for best performance" is selected.
The problem is when I go to windows update, the CPU goes to 100% and the
PC freezes.
I'm not at all surprised. Had you verified that all of your PC's
hardware components are capable of supporting WinXP? This information
will be found at the PC's manufacturer's web site, and on Microsoft's
Windows Catalog: (http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/hcl/default.mspx)
You should also have taken a few minutes to ensure that there are
WinXP-specific device drivers available for all of the machine's
components. There may not be, if the PC was specifically designed for
Win98/Me. Also bear in mind that PCs designed for, sold and run fine
with Win9x/Me very often do not meet WinXP's much more stringent hardware
*quality* requirements. This is particularly true of many models in
Compaq's consumer-class Presario product line or HP's consumer-class
Pavilion product line. WinXP, like WinNT and Win2K before it, is quite
sensitive to borderline defective or substandard hardware (particularly
motherboards, RAM and hard drives) that will still support Win9x.
HOW TO Prepare to Upgrade Win98 or WinMe
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q316639
Upgrading to Windows XP
http://aumha.org/win5/a/xpupgrad.htm
HOW TO Troubleshoot Windows XP Problems During Installation When You
Upgrade from Windows 98 or Windows Me
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q310064
If you call Dell, they tell you to call Microsoft....
Well, yes. By installing a non-OEM (i.e., not from Dell) OS, you voided
any support agreements that Dell might have had with you. Dell's
resposible for supporting that computer only so long as it remained
"pure" Dell.
....and if you call Microsoft they tell you to call Dell.
Because Microsoft can't control the compatibility or quality of those
antique Dell hardware components.
Unfortunately, you've placed yourself in "support limbo" by
unnecessarily trying to upgrade an incompatible or (most likely)
sub-standard system.
Any help is appreciated.
Reinstall Win98 and leave well enough alone. (Or replace the computer
with something a bit more modern, if you can afford it.)
--
Bruce Chambers
Help us help you:
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Benjamin Franklin
Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. -Bertrum
Russell
.
- References:
- upgrade to windows XP
- From: A E
- Re: upgrade to windows XP
- From: Bruce Chambers
- Re: upgrade to windows XP
- From: A E
- upgrade to windows XP
- Prev by Date: Yellow ? in Device Manager causing videos to freeze
- Next by Date: Re: msconfig question
- Previous by thread: Re: upgrade to windows XP
- Next by thread: files searched for repair
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
