Re: Dual core settings
- From: "Chelsea" <gallium1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 14:30:54 -0000
Dual channel memory is a bit more expensive than single channel and is
installed as pairs which should have been pre-tested as a combination.
Windows XP was written before dual core architecture became a reality. I
think I'm right in saying that XP doesn't take much advantage of it-you'll
need to wait for Windows Vista for that.
Chelsea
"Ozvideo" <ozvideo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ONEjnmsAGHA.2704@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I recently had a new motherboard & a dual core processor installed. I also
>went from 512MG Ram to 1 GB. I can't see any improvement in speed when
>doing things like rendering video ETC.
>
> As I boot up I notice that one of the things that goes flashing by
> are the words 'memory runs at single channel'. I'm not certain exactly
> just what this means but I was under the impression that my motherboard
> was a dual channel. So it occurred to me that there may have been things
> in BIOS or elsewhere that wasn't altered but should have been to alter.
> Could this be the case?
> --
> Thanks in advance
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dual core settings
- From: kenny
- Re: Dual core settings
- References:
- Dual core settings
- From: Ozvideo
- Dual core settings
- Prev by Date: Re: Connect / Disconnect
- Next by Date: Re: screen display is rotated 90 degrees
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual core settings
- Next by thread: Re: Dual core settings
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading