RE: Access Denied for Event Viewer or Regedit



Hey Ken,
So rather than use the OEM file from another machine, I downloaded and
installed the "Windows XP Security Guide and Templates" package and use the
SetupSecurity.inf file in there to make the changes.

After doing so created the results I desired.

I would request that Microsoft look at the upgrade proceedure for windows
2000 to Windows XP, or at teh very least create a KB that helps admins to
resolve this issue. It is interesting that performing a google search
results in lots of people having this issue but nobody having a solution.

But there does appear to be an issue with the upgrade process, both from the
inf file standpoint, but also with the forum topic I opened with regard the
Help Assistant feature of Help and Support not working, of which we still do
not have a solution for.

Thanks Ken for your help. We can close this one out.

J

"Ken Zhao [MSFT]" wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Thanks for your detaled response!
>
> However, for your new related question, I am not sure if you can run the
> inf from the OEM working machine. You may test it.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Ken Zhao
>
> Microsoft Online Partner Support
> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
>
> =====================================================
> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
> that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
> =====================================================
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
>
>
>
> --------------------
> | Thread-Topic: Access Denied for Event Viewer or Regedit
> | thread-index: AcX0QAiw5lFB95xvQluwL4JoQe+PPw==
> | X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 209.217.222.70
> | From: "=?Utf-8?B?U211cmZtYW4=?=" <smurfman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | References: <6F225F11-01EE-4584-8F01-D52296F4C0F9@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <f7Q5wwy7FHA.832@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <3C39AFAB-2BF4-4DF5-881A-94C52CA4E0E5@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <57xiUf$7FHA.4000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <A81687E5-9246-4A50-B024-F2B53B351E43@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <F3wE7qM8FHA.3380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | Subject: RE: Access Denied for Event Viewer or Regedit
> | Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:20:31 -0800
> | Lines: 333
> | Message-ID: <5DD82C2E-77C8-4DF3-991B-98687FB64F1C@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | MIME-Version: 1.0
> | Content-Type: text/plain;
> | charset="Utf-8"
> | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> | X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
> | Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
> | Importance: normal
> | Priority: normal
> | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
> | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
> | NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
> | Path: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
> | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl
> microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support:602782
> | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
> |
> | ADDITIONAL INFO:
> |
> | I noted the two secsetup.inf files are a difference between 511kb on the
> | upgraded machine and 800kb on my OEM machine.
> |
> | I seached the upgraded secsetup.inf file for winreg and noted this line:
> |
> | 3e="machine\system\currentcontrolset\control\securepipeservers\winreg",
> 2,
> | "D:P(A;CI;GA;;;BA)(A;;GR;;;BO)"
> |
> | In my OEM secsetup.inf file, the same line read this way:
> |
> | 57="machine\system\currentcontrolset\control\securepipeservers\winreg",
> 2,
> | "D:P(A;CI;GA;;;BA)(A;;GR;;;BO)(A;CI;GR;;;LS)"
> |
> | The file date is 05/29/2002. I looked at another machine that was not
> | upgraded yet and this was the file version present there. It seems that
> | during the upgrade the secsetup files and database are not being created.
>
> | Keep in mind too that a windows 2000 %windir% is \WINNT and XP of course
> is
> | \WINDOWS.
> |
> | 08/09/2004 was the date of an OEM file.
> |
> | SO HERE IS MY NEW RELATED QUESTION....
> |
> | Can I copy the inf file from a working OEM machine and rerun the command?
> | Would I need the secsetup.sdb file, and were is this located that I may
> see
> | if this fixes other issues?
> |
> | J
> |
> | "Ken Zhao [MSFT]" wrote:
> |
> | > Hello,
> | >
> | > Thanks for your efforts and reply!
> | >
> | > At this time, if the winreg key has been added in the registry, on the
> | > Windows XP SP2, please add Local Service to the
> | >
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurePipeServers\winreg
> | > key with Read - Allow permissions, and then test this issue again.
> | >
> | > If this issue still exists, please refer to the following KB article to
> | > reset the security settings to the default, and test this issue again.
> | >
> | > 313222: How To Reset Security Settings Back to the Defaults
> | > http://support.microsoft.com/?id=313222
> | >
> | > In addition, I noticed you said "Also in one KB I noted that it
> suggested
> | > making sure the Permissions key was listed under the winreg key we
> started
> | > talking about...My machines do not have a permissions key...all of
> them.
> | > Is this normal? All I have is AllowedPaths...?" I am not sure what is
> the
> | > KB number? Is this a Microsoft knowledge article?
> | >
> | > Hope the suggestions help!
> | >
> | > Thanks & Regards,
> | >
> | > Ken Zhao
> | >
> | > Microsoft Online Partner Support
> | > Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
> | >
> | > =====================================================
> | > When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader
> so
> | > that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
> | > =====================================================
> | > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> | >
> | >
> | >
> | >
> | > --------------------
> | > | Thread-Topic: Access Denied for Event Viewer or Regedit
> | > | thread-index: AcXwZ2EvAoQ7cZrjQneIPLoo59M5FQ==
> | > | X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 209.217.222.70
> | > | From: "=?Utf-8?B?U211cmZtYW4=?=" <smurfman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | > | References: <6F225F11-01EE-4584-8F01-D52296F4C0F9@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | > <f7Q5wwy7FHA.832@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | > <3C39AFAB-2BF4-4DF5-881A-94C52CA4E0E5@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | > <57xiUf$7FHA.4000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | > | Subject: RE: Access Denied for Event Viewer or Regedit
> | > | Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:52:05 -0800
> | > | Lines: 345
> | > | Message-ID: <A81687E5-9246-4A50-B024-F2B53B351E43@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | > | MIME-Version: 1.0
> | > | Content-Type: text/plain;
> | > | charset="Utf-8"
> | > | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> | > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
> | > | Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
> | > | Importance: normal
> | > | Priority: normal
> | > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
> | > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
> | > | NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
> | > | Path: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
> | > | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl
> | > microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support:601402
> | > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
> | > |
> | > | Hi Ken.
> | > | Well, regarding the KB, I confirmed that my GPO is being applied, by
> | > using
> | > | the Group Policy Results.
> | > |
> | > | Windows Firewall: Allow remote administration exception Enabled
> | > | Default Domain Firewall Policy
> | > | Allow unsolicited incoming messages from: 192.168.1.204,192.168.1.207
> | > |
> | > | ---
> | > |
> | > | In the mean time here is what I performed. I took my machine did a
> | > system
> | > | restore back to Monday Morning when I started the W2K upgrade...to XP
> | > Pro.
> | > | After the reboot, I noted that SP2 was still installed even after the
> | > system
> | > | restore. So I performed an Uninstall, which also removed all of my
> | > Updates
> | > | that I had made.
> | > |
> | > | I then rebooted, and tried my test again, but I still get the Access
> | > Denied
> | > | for Event Viewer and Regedit.
> | > |
> | > | I am re-applying SP2 and getting the machine to be in use again.
> | > |
> | > | The issue must have to do with the Upgrade from Windows 2000 to
> Windows
> | > XP.
> | > |
> | > | I am using my Windows XP Core CD as part of my Open License, and
> choosing
> | > | the Upgrade option when running under Windows 2000 and starting the
> | > install.
> | > |
> | > | I am not using a Windows XP Upgrade CD...I never received one and was
> | > told I
> | > | could use my Open CD to perform the same step. I use the CD Key from
> the
> | > | particular license that has the upgrades that I have specified. For
> | > example
> | > | Machines 1-5 are all on a particular license where I purchased 5
> upgrades
> | > | from Windows 2000 to XP. I then went and got the CD keys from the
> eOpen
> | > site
> | > | as usual, and performed the upgrade, it takes the keys. I am
> mentioning
> | > all
> | > | of this to make sure this is not the issue I am running into...?
> | > |
> | > | --
> | > |
> | > | Also in one KB I noted that it suggested making sure the Permissions
> key
> | > was
> | > | listed under the winreg key we started talking about...My machines do
> not
> | > | have a permissions key...all of them. Is this normal? All I have is
> | > | AllowedPaths...?
> | > |
> | > | Thanks
> | > | J
> | > |
> | > | "Ken Zhao [MSFT]" wrote:
> | > |
> | > | > Hello,
> | > | >
> | > | > Thanks for your reply and additional info!
> | > | >
> | > | > I am not sure if you have tried the other methods that described in
> | > | > KB840634. If not, I suggest you try the other two methods.
> | > | >
> | > | > If the problem persists, I will suggest you make the following test:
> | > | > Please upgrade from Windows 2000 to Windows XP and not apply the
> SP2 on
> | > a
> | > | > test machine. And then test the issue again. It will help us narrow
> | > down if
> | > | > the issue is related to SP2 applying.
> | > | >
> | > | > In addition, if the problem starts occurring recently, I also
> suggest
> | > you
> | > | > perform a System Restore to revert back to the initial status or
> other
> | > | > correct state.
> | > | >
> | > | > Note: If you have some important documents or files which are
> created
> | > after
> | > | > the restore point, please copy them to My Document. This is a
> | > precaution to
> | > | > take even if you are back to the initial status, files will still
> | > remain in
> | > | > My Documents.
> | > | >
> | > | > To restore your system to a previous state, we can use the
> following
> | > steps:
> | > | >
> | > | > 1. Before you start, please close all open files and close all open
> | > | > programs.
> | > | > 2. Click "Start"; Click "Programs or All Programs"; Click
> | > "Accessories";
> | > | > Click "System Tools"; Click "System Restore". The System Restore
> user
> | > | > interface should appear.
> | > | > 3. Select "Restore my computer to an earlier time" and click "Next".
> | > | > 4. From the restore points available, select an appropriate restore
> | > point
> | > | > when your system is working correctly and click "Next".
> | > | > 5. Click "Next" again. The restore process will run and your system
> | > will
> | > | > restart automatically.
> | > | > 6. After restarting, check whether your system functions correctly
> now.
> | > If
> | > | > not, you can undo your last restoration or select another restore
> point
> | > in
> | > | > System Restore user interface.
> | > | >
> | > | > 306084: How to restore the operating system to a previous state in
> | > Windows
> | > | > XP
> | > | > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;306084
> | > | >
> | > | > Hope that helps!
> | > | >
> | > | > Thanks & Regards,
> | > | >
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Analyst: $120 for Windows 7 Way Too Much
    ... :> users off the aging Windows XP and make them forget the bad ... :> Earlier today, Microsoft unveiled list prices for Windows 7, ... :> around $300," said Baker, who's dubious about Microsoft's ... :> homes, and by making the upgrade expensive, and a bit ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Windows vista will leave too many people behind.
    ... You are being forced to upgrade by Microsoft? ... 'force' making you get Windows Vista. ... It happens - I bet there are many software and hardware packages that still ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Analyst: $120 for Windows 7 Way Too Much
    ... :> users off the aging Windows XP and make them forget the bad ... :> "I'm very disappointed in the upgrade pricing," said Stephen ... :> Earlier today, Microsoft unveiled list prices for Windows 7, ... :> around $300," said Baker, who's dubious about Microsoft's ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: XP OEM recovery disk
    ... You can buy Windows XP OEM with just a power cord although that might ... of the hardware at installation time since EVERYONE upgrades over time. ... the SOFTWARE is an upgrade, any transfer must also include all prior ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: Analyst: $120 for Windows 7 Way Too Much
    ... :> users off the aging Windows XP and make them forget the bad taste of Vista, ... "I would have much rather seen Microsoft come ... :> around $300," said Baker, who's dubious about Microsoft's upgrade pricing. ...
    (soc.retirement)