Re: whats the best pop up blocker?



Leythos,

Thank you for your opinion. I will keep posting here and helping users.

-Nick

"Leythos" <void@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:E0ngf.136908$tD4.114555@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <aoqdncL7yM5IZRzenZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> nicks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
> > Users are asking questions here, and I am providing an answer. It so
happens
> > the answer is a product I have created to solve these users exact
problems -
> > user want a solution - not to download 50 free products only to have
nothing
> > work and their computer be filled with software that did not solve their
> > problem.
>
> You are NOT providing answers you are providing a LINK to a program that
> you have a vested interest in - that makes you a spammer. If you didn't
> have a vested interest in the product it would not be spam.
>
> > I have personally helped dozens of users solve their problems for FREE.
>
> Which has nothing to do with your spamming the group.
>
> > I
> > have given away hundreds of copies of my software to users I have
assisted
> > from these very groups. I will continue to post in this group as I am an
> > educated and qualified technical person who can actually assist users
and
> > help the group.
>
> Your "give away" or education level has nothing to do with the fact that
> you are spamming the group wiht a advert for a product that you have a
> vested interest in.
>
> As it stands, your product is not the only product that makes the claims
> you do, but your product is the only one being hawked here by a person
> with a vested interest in it - and is commercially available.
>
> > It is interesting that only you and maybe one other person complain
about
> > ANY of my posts - if it was blatent advertisement for a product that did
not
> > work or help anyone I am sure I, and the group, would hear about it.
>
> You site two different things - If it was an ad and the second is if it
> didn't work - the two have nothing to do with each other.
>
> If you post a link to a commercial product, to every post that might
> benefit from it, and you have a vested interest in it, then you're a
> spammer.
>
> If I were to post a link to your product, even by itself, it would not
> be spamming as I have no vested interest in your product - that's the
> difference between a spammer and a helper.
>
>
> --
>
> spam999free@xxxxxxxxxx
> remove 999 in order to email me


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: whats the best pop up blocker?
    ... There's no crime in suggesting a program inwhich you have a vested interest, ... and I've had good experiences with their technical support. ... >> you have a vested interest in - that makes you a spammer. ... >> Which has nothing to do with your spamming the group. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: online research - please read
    ... Well, you're also spamming. ... any dissertation based on self-selected survey participants ... Standard spammer response: "I'm not spamming. ... Go light yourself on fire. ...
    (rec.games.frp.dnd)
  • NEWSGROUP SPAM, WAS: Outsourcing in China
    ... cease and desist spamming a software newsgroup... ... the worst they can do is cancel your free account. ... Buzz off, spammer. ... One of the original approvers of the comp.databases.ms-access newsgroup, ...
    (comp.databases.ms-access)
  • Re: Spam E-Mail
    ... This is important to the spammer, as many e-mail address lists may have ... to regect or bounce e-mails that are probably spam. ... for spamming, or sold to people to use for spamming. ... harvesting robots can't recognize it, ...
    (microsoft.public.security)
  • Re: Finally!! Broadcom 802.11g for Linux
    ... > the software's license / terms but there ya go. ... > spammer, but that's where your argument has got all fucked up. ... about a commercial product! ... and shouldn't be defending it now that he ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)