FIles which can't be copied -- could they have a cyclic structure?

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance



I had a hard drive failure, to the point of having to rebuild the boot sector and revert to the default SYSTEM.SYS, SOFTWARE.SYS, etc. I then tried copying my useful files over the network to another computer. Part way through the copy hung up, and when the machines were restarted CHKDSK ran (and I haven't been able to find the log on it). At that point I shut the XP machine down.

I ran out a bought a second hard drive and installed it.

First, I tried to clone the bad disk, using an Acronis rescue disk. That failed, after the estimated time reached 3 minutes it started slowly increasing. I left it running over night and in the morning it was showing 14 minutes to go, and was totally unresponsive.

I then installed XP on the new drive, switching the bad drive to SATA port 1.

My next try was Unstoppable Copy. This time, when it reached a particular directory, filled with .BMP files (all in the 8 to 12 MB range) it slowed to a stand-still. Even with "Auto-skip" checked it would take a couple of minutes on each file (actually, the first hundred or so files were fine, but after that things fell apart) before skipping it.

I then tried EasyRecovery Pro.  It hung up on the same files.

As a final desperate measure I ran Norton Disk Doctor, which gave the file system a clean bill of health!

I also tried to copy one of the files from the COMMAND-box, and again, the copy never terminated. When id did a DIR the lengths were all reasonable. This is also true in Windows Explorer. You can look, but you can't touch. Or copy, or read, or move. I haven't tried to delete one, either.

So -- what could the matter be? It isn't a total disaster, as these are scans of items which I still have, but it will be a bother to recreate them. Has anyone encountered a similar situation? I don't know the structure of the NTFS file system, but if it were a FAT I would suspect a cycle in the chain of sectors. Could this be the case? If so, how could it be fixed?
.




Relevant Pages

  • Re: Weird behavior of dd
    ... on the disk in terms of a file system. ... That's because you don't understand what a file system is. ... Or how a floppy disk is organised, or what sectors and tracks are, or a boot sector. ... FORMAT is the program that writes to a raw floppy and with the /S command puts a boot sector on it. ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: FAT16 or FAT32 boot sector doesnt matter???
    ... By boot sector do you meam MBR (first sector of the disk), ... file system you are using. ... FAT32, put an XPe target onto it, and installed a FAT16 boot sector. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.embedded)
  • Re: Are computer forensics people as stupid as they seem?
    ... already a contiguous file on disk. ... I fully document how to do it with DCPP, people have tried it and I ... which lets you encrypt your entire HD (except for the boot sector ... I have used two drives: the one I am preparing and another ...
    (alt.privacy)
  • Re: XP Install Problem?
    ... Did a Seagate HD test from a bootable disk and when I did a long test it ... in setup but this computers setup did not have that option. ... I even tried installing an old copy of ME but when it started ... installing it it asked me BOOT SECTOR WRITE!! ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: boot sector f*ed
    ... the disk has run out of spare sectors, and it is time to get a new disk. ... But probably not a problem with the boot sector. ... The fbsd minimal installation that I had set up for recovery of the ...
    (freebsd-questions)