Re: Drive Image destroyed partition
From: johnf (john_f_at_bigREMOVEpond.net.au)
Date: 10/09/04
- Next message: Robert L. Rauch: "SP2 installation crashed XP Home"
- Previous message: Rick \: "Re: CD Drives not recognised"
- In reply to: Terry Pinnell: "Re: Drive Image destroyed partition"
- Next in thread: johnf: "Re: Drive Image destroyed partition"
- Reply: johnf: "Re: Drive Image destroyed partition"
- Reply: Terry Pinnell: "Re: Drive Image destroyed partition"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 11:39:12 +1000
I wouldn't worry about the extended partition, just pretend it's not there.
It probably was created when you were resizing the partitions using XP
Computer Management.
I prefer to use PM for all that sort of stuff, I'm more at home with PM as I
can see exactly what's going on & pending.
If you like, have a go at merging the extended bit into [D] using PM, as D
is only for data; that will leave your C:E ratios untouched for future
back-up imaging.
-- johnf > "johnf" <john_f@bigREMOVEpond.net.au> wrote: > >> It doesn't look too bad to me. >> Merge Disk2 (unallocated) with Backup [F:] >> Re-partition Disk 2 to approx. the same ratios as Disk 1, rename >> Partition 1 to E: & then image C to E. >> >> I'm also curious as to how you have your cables set up to those drives. >> >> The correct method should be both drives jumpered to CS (Cable Select) >> & both on the one cable, plugged into IDE1, with HDD1 on the END >> connector & HDD2 on the intermediate connector. >> Check your BIOS to make sure the two drives are auto-detected >> correctly & then set (standard BIOS menu) to 'Auto' for both drives. >> IDE2 used separately to run CD-Rom drive(s). >> >> ** Check all that cabling out before you try any more imaging. > > Many thanks, appreciate the help. I'm reassured by your opening > sentence, and I am indeed making progress. But I still have some > worries. The devil is in the details, so I'll explain fully. > > But first, the cables. They should be OK. I have made no changes since > I installed the 2nd identical Maxtor way back, and the modest > partioning and copying I did then with PM 7 and DI 2002 respectively > worked OK. I've had no problems with either HD or any of the 4 > partitions - well, no obvious ones anyway. My PC is working fine, and > I am operating with both hard disks. > > I started the morning by recovering my E partition, which I managed > more simply than I expected by using XP Computer Management>Disk > Management. Just r-clicked that space and created a partition called > E. Then, because of that bad sector message, I did > chkdsk c: /r > as I'd realised that my previous chkdsk c: /f had not checked the > sectors. I was encouraged when after half an hour it found a bad > sector: "Windows replaced bad clusters in file 10904 of name > windows/system32/glmf32.dll" > > I then meant to do a similar chkdsk /r on e:, but carelessly repeated > it on c:. As there appeared to be no Cancel option, I sat through it > again. But I was surprised to see that identical message appear again. > Is that because XP doesn't actually *repair* the sector or cluster, > but just sort of fixes the index or whatever? > > Anyway, I then tried to repeat my drive copy of C to E with DI 2002. > But this time, although both C and E were apparently identical sizes > of 11.72 GB, I noticed that it said the destination was too small. > Presumably by a whisker. > > So then I ran PM 7 and nervously moved E and F around, and marginally > increased E's size. That ran 9 'operations' and took about 3 hours! > > But now I am very confused by the display I see in PM: > http://www.terrypin.dial.pipex.com/Misc/PM-AfterChanges.gif > > For one thing, I don't recall previously seeing anything about an > 'Extended' partition before the changes, although I could be mistaken. > Is this an error on my part? Can I get rid of this Extended partition, > which just adds another level complexity as far as I'm concerned? > > But also, the sizes shown do not square with what I get from XP Disk > Management: > http://www.terrypin.dial.pipex.com/Misc/XPDiskMgmt.gif > > That shows E as only 11.83 GB, not 12.11 GB. > > Any further help would be greatly appreciated please, as I am *very* > uncomfortable with this stuff. > > -- > Terry, West Sussex, UK
- Next message: Robert L. Rauch: "SP2 installation crashed XP Home"
- Previous message: Rick \: "Re: CD Drives not recognised"
- In reply to: Terry Pinnell: "Re: Drive Image destroyed partition"
- Next in thread: johnf: "Re: Drive Image destroyed partition"
- Reply: johnf: "Re: Drive Image destroyed partition"
- Reply: Terry Pinnell: "Re: Drive Image destroyed partition"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|