p4 2.8 ht slower than amd +2600
From: alan lim (wdsin2003_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/09/04
- Next message: Ben: "Re: p4 2.8 ht slower than amd +2600"
- Previous message: Ben: "Re: Losing monitor power off setting"
- Next in thread: Ben: "Re: p4 2.8 ht slower than amd +2600"
- Reply: Ben: "Re: p4 2.8 ht slower than amd +2600"
- Reply: frodo_at_theshire.org: "Re: p4 2.8 ht slower than amd +2600"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 19:21:40 +0800
hi to all,
I have 2 setup of the following specs
system 1
p4 2.8c ht / msi 875P neo motherboard
Elsa Gladiac525 ti 4200 128mb video card
60 Gb SATA maxtor hd
1 GB kingston ram
tdk cyclone cd/rw
msi dvd rom
system 2
amd +2600 / abit nf7 motherboard
albatron ti 4280 128mb video card
40 GB maxtor IDE hd
1 GB kingston ram
generic cd rom
hp 8200 cd/rw
I have been working on both computers actively and have observed that my
system 1 actually perform slower than system 2.
System 1 took double the time in opening application and general working on
software like photoshop and 3dmax.
Isn't system 1 a better machine than 2? I have swap every piece of
hardware, like the ram and video card, as well as remove
cdrom. But system 2 still out perform 1 in every aspect. Or can I simply say
amd is far more superior that intel when it come to raw cpu comparison.
Could the problem be in the SATA HDD? like I might have configure wrongly.
some how.( this is my first SATA hd installed), like maybe need special
setting.
Please advise.
Thanks a million
Alan
- Next message: Ben: "Re: p4 2.8 ht slower than amd +2600"
- Previous message: Ben: "Re: Losing monitor power off setting"
- Next in thread: Ben: "Re: p4 2.8 ht slower than amd +2600"
- Reply: Ben: "Re: p4 2.8 ht slower than amd +2600"
- Reply: frodo_at_theshire.org: "Re: p4 2.8 ht slower than amd +2600"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
