Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015
From: Peter (0spam0)
Date: 08/23/04
- Next message: Aunty Flo: "Explorer windows"
- Previous message: FRE52: "Durning installation windows does noy reboot"
- In reply to: Interrogative: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Next in thread: Al: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Reply: Al: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Reply: Interrogative: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:37:11 -0400
Your original post (if you clicked reply on it) would show multiple
newsgroup addresses were used, therefore any reply would automatically cross
post too. I don't cross post myself, but if you want to then go ahead.
To me it's a waste of time and resources as these groups are busy enough.
-- Peter. Toronto, Canada. Windows XP Home SP2. Pentium4 Dual HT @ 3.0ghz, 160gb HD, 1gb DDR. "Interrogative" <If@you.dont.ask.nicely.no> wrote in message news:%23r44BQRiEHA.1356@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... >I replied to YOUR post thus the crossposting from me. So, your reply >elicited my crosspost. > > > "Peter" <0spam0 AT rogers DOT com> wrote in message > news:e4Bj5IRiEHA.140@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... >> No problem really but MS might object to crossposting which I noticed you >> do, hence any answers are automatically posted to all groups too. It >> just causes clutter that's all. >> >> -- >> Peter. >> Toronto, Canada. >> Windows XP Home SP2. >> Pentium4 Dual HT @ 3.0ghz, 160gb HD, 1gb DDR. >> "Interrogative" <If@you.dont.ask.nicely.no> wrote in message >> news:%23NHdXGRiEHA.3428@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... >>> No idea. Why did you do it? >>> >>> >>> "Peter" <0spam0 AT rogers DOT com> wrote in message >>> news:eZT4WRIiEHA.704@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... >>>> What is the point of posting in every single group?? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Peter. >>>> Toronto, Canada. >>>> Windows XP Home SP2. >>>> Pentium4 Dual HT @ 3.0ghz, 160gb HD, 1gb DDR. >>>> "Leo Feret" <chessDELETEcanoe@excite.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:X23Wc.6238$dB6.1680@nwrddc03.gnilink.net... >>>>> With SP2 firewall off, ZAP 5.0.590.043 and SP2 play well together. >>>>> >>>>> Interrogative wrote: >>>>>> "IWB" <IBecker@prodigy.net> wrote in message >>>>>> news:E60F15A9-AF56-4FEC-AC69-2332BBB8DB32@microsoft.com... >>>>>>> I'm wondering about the new ZoneAlarm 5.1.011. Is it as bad as >>>>>>> 5.0.590.015? >>>>>>> Anyone other than ZA labs test it yet. what do any of you reccomend >>>>>>> especially to some of us with subscriptions until 2005! >>>>>> >>>>>> New version of ZA - latest available - works like a charm even with >>>>>> XPSP2 firewall set on. Never a problem with them. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Leo Feret - "I'm not always at the keyboard; >>>>> ·|ΤΏΤ¬|· sometimes I use the trackball." >>>>> ____________________________________________ >>>>> "The greatest mistake you can make in life is to be continually >>>>> fearing you will make one." >>>>> - Elbert Hubbard >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
- Next message: Aunty Flo: "Explorer windows"
- Previous message: FRE52: "Durning installation windows does noy reboot"
- In reply to: Interrogative: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Next in thread: Al: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Reply: Al: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Reply: Interrogative: "Re: ZoneAlarm ver 5.0.590.015"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|