Re: Is Windows firewall a supplement to third party FW?

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Bruce Chambers (bchambers_at_nospamcableone.net)
Date: 06/27/04


Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:51:42 -0600

Greetings --

    No, WinXP's built-in ICF is _not_ designed to act as a compliment
to 3rd party firewalls, and Microsoft actually recommends disabling it
if you use another software firewall, although a great many people
have reported no problems using ICF in conjunction with other
products. Running two or more software firewalls simultaneously is
generally unnecessary and can sometimes cause conflicts, possibly
negating the protection of both. In any event, having two firewalls
running simultaneously is most certainly an unnecessary drain on
system resources.

    However, the much improved Windows Firewall that comes as part of
WinXP's Service Pack 2 _is_ designed to compliment 3rd party
firewalls.

Bruce Chambers

-- 
Help us help you:
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on
having both at once. - RAH
"Hem" <no_reply@please.com> wrote in message
news:eemNEEFXEHA.3944@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> XP Home, SP1. Is the ICF intended as a supplement to third party
firewalls?
> What I mean by this is if I use a third party fw should I deactivate
the
> Windows one or leave it on. Thanks.
>
> -- 
> Regards
>
>


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is Windows firewall a supplement to third party FW?
    ... if you use another software firewall, ... Running two or more software firewalls simultaneously is ... WinXP's Service Pack 2 _is_ designed to compliment 3rd party ... Is the ICF intended as a supplement to third party ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
  • Re: XP Pro client hangs after connecting via wizard
    ... There are no 3rd party ... > there any third party firewalls active? ... >> security event log there is a failure which shows the PC trying to ... >> authenticate to a domain which is the name of the PC. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: proposal: TCP rendevous
    ... >>would be limited by throughput limits on the 3rd party link. ... >>by the two parties. ... >imagine it must rely on the NAT firewalls not changing the source UDP port ...
    (freebsd-net)
  • Re: proposal: TCP rendevous
    ... > would be limited by throughput limits on the 3rd party link. ... > by the two parties. ... imagine it must rely on the NAT firewalls not changing the source UDP port ...
    (freebsd-net)
  • RE: Hardware Firewall vs Software Firewall
    ... Hardware Firewall vs Software Firewall ... but there is a LOT of misinformation on this list about firewalls ... the PIX is not just a glorified a Cisco router with ACLs. ...
    (Security-Basics)