Re: making a removable SSD drive nonremovable
- From: Uwe Sieber <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:31:45 +0200
M.I.5¾ wrote:
"Uwe Sieber" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:7ijk7aF2u7oonU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxM.I.5¾ wrote:"Uwe Sieber" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:7i0sf2F303suoU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxCan you provide a link to such an incedibleM.I.5¾ wrote:No, I was talking about DRAM. Modern DRAM is also able to operate with tiny currents."Uwe Sieber" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:7hrqgvF2uv6g6U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxI think you are talking about SRAM cards. SRAM is static, itM.I.5¾ wrote:Looking at the differences in price between RAM chips and FLASH chips, the difference isn't that great these days. RAM is certainly faster than FLASH, especially when writing."Uwe Sieber" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:7hhaifF2u78pjU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxBeacauseM.I.5¾ wrote:Why?"Uwe Sieber" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:7hf4jpF2tobmkU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSSD with battery backed RAM in a NetBook? I don't think so.M.I.5¾ wrote:Are you certain that it's not battery backed RAM? This is far more usual."Mike Vandeman" <aaone@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wroteThe internal drive is flash too, so it seems toI have an Acer Aspire One, with 500 MB ram, an internal 8 GB 'system' SSD, to which I've installed an 16 GB SDHC card in the "storage expansion" slot.Using a FLASH based memory card in the way you suggest is a very bad idea.
First the windows paging file should be on the fastest available drive. Putting in a FLASH based memory will make Windows take a very significant performance hit.
Second, the FLASH memory technology has a very limited write/rewrite life and using it as intensively as you are, you will use up that life fairly quickly. Failure modes vary, but generally, once the contoller chip detects an error it prevents access to the entire memory. Either the memory becomes read only, or more usually, the memory disappears from windows entirely. I could send you several memory cards and USB sticks that have failed.
be a good idea to stress a cheap SD card instead
the expensive internal flash drive.
- Battery backed RAM is by far more expensive than pure flash and
NetBooks are made as cheap a possible.
- The Acer Aspire One mentioned by to OP is documentended to haveBattery backed RAM is used in many portable products that don't remotely qualify as servers.
a flash SSD (as all NetBooks I've seen so far are)
- Battery backed RAM SSDs are made for servers with USVs because
thay are not made to hold data for month or years without
power
- Any computer whoose system drive's data is just gone afterBattery backed RAM can retain data for many years from just a coin battery without external power being applied. Last year, I had to replace a battery for the first time on a RAM card that is 12 years old. It's a bit bigger than a coin battery, but then the RAM card is bit bigger than what we are talking about.
some weeks without power is complete nonsense
needs no refresh. To hold the data it needs some nano Amperes
only, so a battery can hold the data for some years.
But SRAM is by far to expensive to build an 8 GB drive
for an $400 NetBook.
product?
DRAM needs permanent refresh, you need a damn big
battery to make 8 GB of DRAM hold data for years.
We use a 4 GB DRAM card to hold terain data on various parts of the world. The whole card operates from a small battery (approx 25mm x 12mm x 5mm). The batteries are now over 5 years old and we have no idea how long they were powering the memory before we got them. FLASH memory was considered, but its write speed is too slow, and it has too short a life.
DRAM only requires a row refresh and it is not necessary for the whole of the DRAM chip to be powered while this takes place (e.g. the column addressing is not required). Indeed, it is only necessary to power the required parts of the actual chip(s) that are being refreshed at any one time. This is why proper DRAM chips have 2 power supply pins, VDD and Vbat
How long does it hold data without external power?
The name of the product?
Uwe
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: making a removable SSD drive nonremovable
- From: M.I.5¾
- Re: making a removable SSD drive nonremovable
- References:
- Re: making a removable SSD drive nonremovable
- From: Uwe Sieber
- Re: making a removable SSD drive nonremovable
- From: M.I.5¾
- Re: making a removable SSD drive nonremovable
- Prev by Date: Re: Total memory in XP pro sp3
- Next by Date: Re: Total memory in XP pro sp3
- Previous by thread: Re: making a removable SSD drive nonremovable
- Next by thread: Re: making a removable SSD drive nonremovable
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading