Re: [fixed] re-enabling RAID1 on existing XP install (Intel® Matrix Storage)

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance



Erwin Moller schreef:
Hi group,

Firsttimer in here: if this group is inapropriate for my question, please direct me te right way. :-)


First some tech stuff, question follows:

--------------------------------------------
Running XP SP3
Hardware: Motherboard: ASUS P5K-e

Intel® Chipset Identification Utility says:
System Information Chipset
Detected Chipset: Intel(R) G33/G31 Express Chipset
Chipset Components
Memory Controller: Intel(R) 82G33/G31 Memory Controller Hub
I/O Controller: Intel(R) 82801IR Intel(R) I/O Controller Hub (ICH9R)
---------------------------------------------

I have 2 SATA HDs in my machine that were working as RAID1 earlier.
I remember installing them as RAID1 Array during XP installation by
pressing F6 (Load Thrid Part SCSI/RAID drivers).

During normal boot-up I always got: Intel® Matrix Storage screen (which
I could enter by pressing ctrl-i to configure it).
My RAID1 functioned normal.

How I screwed up:
My machine never booted the first time, it always needed a second try to get past POST message and into windows boot.
So I fiddled around in the BIOS, and decided, in my endless wisdom, to change my SATA from IDE to RAID. --> WRONG!
No more booting at all. :-(

No problem, I thought, let's put it back to IDE.
Now my machine boots again, but my drivers for RAID (Intel® Matrix Storage) are totally gone.
I have now, of course, an extra HD, since my RAID1 is gone, which is indeed a mirror of the C-drive I boot from now. (Better maybe: it WAS a mirror, since I have no more mirroring going on now. )
The Intel® Matrix Storage Manager (a windows application) fails to start and says it misses the required plug-ins.

How do I reenable RAID1 on my XP?
I DO have a floppy with the right drivers, the ones I used with the first time install.

Any advise?
I don't feel like reinstalling my whole XP and all the apps on it.
I read through the manual of intell, but they adress only loading the RAID drivers during XP setup.

Thanks.

Regards,
Erwin Moller


Hi,

I fixed it. :-)
In case somebody else runs into a similar problom, maybe this helps:

What confused me was the fact my SATA-controllers were in IDE mode, even though I had RAID1 up and running.

This is what I did:
1) Update my BIOS. (Version P5KE1013 in my case)
2) unplug second drive
3) booted -> go to BIOS -> changed my SATA controller from IDE to RAID.
4) Reboot -> Check if if Intel® Matrix comes up during boot.
(It did in my case)
It reported degraded RAID array (duh, 1 drive was disconnected)
5) booted into Windows, where Intel® Matrix Storage manager complained it missed a drive.
6) shut down.
7) inserted the second SATA drive
8) Rebooted.

All works fine now (it is rebuilding now.)
And I am glad my BIOS reports my drives now on SATA controller as RAID.

Oh well, sorry for the noise. ;-)

Regards,
Erwin Moller
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is RAID worth it?
    ... as RAID0 (there are also two other HDD's for data/storage set as RAID1), then I read a thread from within this newsgroup in which Carey Frisch directed someone to read - Why RAID is a Terrible Idea http://www.pugetsystems.com/articles?&id=29 and that has made me re-think my plans. ... Is RAID really worth? ... Indeed my own experience of a previous PC with RAID1 showed that it was by no means an easy task to restore everything when one HDD did fail after just 4 months. ... The one think that RAID1 'was' in my mind always useful for was data protection so I'm thinking there must be a way whereby I can install all four drives so that only two are visible and the other two are a mirror image set so that at the end of the day, or maybe twice a day, some software would back up the main visible drives to the 'invisible' back-up drives. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.vista.installation_setup)
  • Re: SATA Raid 1 Data Corruption - A7N8X / RocketRaid 1520
    ... I thought you said the drives were signalling at SATA150 rate?. ... so the controller cannot use the faster rates. ... > they work for RAID 0 they should really work for RAID 1? ... >>however this has happened, since used in combination with RAID1, as ...
    (alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus)
  • Re: SATA Raid 1 Data Corruption - A7N8X / RocketRaid 1520
    ... > raid must at least with 3 hdd then raid work!! ... three drives or more (which is what the 'reference' you are seeing is ... However 'RAID1', gives redundancy, and works perfectly with many ... some borderline I/O problem with the drives, which is showing up in the ...
    (alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus)
  • Re: Raid 1 vs Raid 5
    ... models, with onboard SATA RAID. ... if you're buying a decent card it is probably both RAID1 and RAID5 ... The difference is the cost of drives. ... 2 drives of xGB capacity. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • RE: my first raid disaster on reboot :o( update
    ... including swap are raid1 and they boot and mount fine now. ... Subject: my first raid disaster on reboot:o(update ... > its corrupt superblock or ext2 file system complaints. ...
    (Debian-User)