Re: crossover couplerr test

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

On Tue, 13 May 2008 07:44:10 +0100, "M.I.5¾"
<no.one@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"OldDuke" <none@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:81ih245uutr8d0bgs9ueupoq3pr45mgmmm@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 12 May 2008 08:15:58 +0100, "Walter Wall" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


"OldDuke" <none@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:61hc24ldfob3jp6i4asnpispp03gua1qk8@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 08 May 2008 06:12:55 -0400, Bob Willard
<BobwBSGS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

OldDuke wrote:

On Wed, 7 May 2008 17:51:46 +0200, "Andre De Clercq"
<andre,declercq@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


I have an RJ45 coupler which is supposed to be a crossover one, but it
doesn't seem to work. Can I test it by adding a crossover cable in the
chain, so that the double crossing results in a standard connection?.


Why ask HERE? Does this have ANYTHING to do with XP OS? NO.

Ask elsewhere


Ignore OldDuke. Most of us think this is a proper NG for the question.

Of course you are WRONG.


Actually he is entirely correct. Everyone else, except you, thinks that
this *is* a proper newsgroup for this question and you don't count because
you obviously have mental problems.

Deal with it. Just because a few of you dumbasses thinks it is
appropriate does not mean that it is. Read the group title. That
says it all.


OK, I have read the group title. It contains the word *hardware*. You are
the *only* dumbass who thinks it isn't appropriate. You deal with it.

Yet you can't read the part that immediately precedes it: WINDOWSXP.
Anybody with an IQ of more than 5 (obviously your's must be lower than
that) can put 2 and 2 together here: WindowsXP + Hardware = questions
about hardware AND WindowsXP. If the OS is not involved, it is out of
place HERE.

Hence YOU are wrong. Just because you don't care if people post OT
crap here does not mean you are RIGHT, just that you TOLERATE it. I
don't. If it's wrong it's wrong. And the posts I point out are
WRONGLY posted here.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: crossover couplerr test
    ... chain, so that the double crossing results in a standard connection?. ... this *is* a proper newsgroup for this question and you don't count because ... Just because a few of you dumbasses thinks it is ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: crossover couplerr test
    ... chain, so that the double crossing results in a standard connection?. ... this *is* a proper newsgroup for this question and you don't count because ... Just because a few of you dumbasses thinks it is ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Over-sensitive Pointer in Internet Explorer
    ... I'm not sure this is the proper newsgroup for this question...but I really ... don't know if it's an XP issue, an IE issue or a hardware issue...so I'll ... SRS ... Prev by Date: ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • sound blaster live 5.1. how many versions?
    ... I realize that this is not quite a proper newsgroup for that post but I did not find any other reasonable having the string 'hardware' in its name. ...
    (comp.os.linux.hardware)