Re: Plug and Play detection of Monitor
- From: Paul <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 18:15:52 -0400
Ken wrote:
On May 4, 1:23 pm, "philo" <ph...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:"Ken" <ka...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0749796f-d04b-43b2-bcfd-1c171be2c367@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On May 4, 10:25 am, "philo" <ph...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:news:946f385d-042f-4eb4-be06-2d3815bc0e41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"Ken" <ka...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
hasOn May 4, 9:01 am, "philo" <ph...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:<snip>Nvidia and ATI have the capability to set a customThe monitor is a G900W with 1440 x 900 resolution. The BENQ site
resolution. Powerstrip from Entechtaiwan ($) can do
that. Nvidia, in the classic control panel, has a
custom resolution dialog. With ATI, there can be a
list of resolutions you can get to show up in a
menu. So there are ways to try to deal with it.
Powerstrip is for cases where all else fails.
So try the monitor driver first, and select "install"
when right-clicked on the INF on the driver CD.
Paul
withdrivers which seem to be the same as those on the CD that camethethe monitor.
Right clicking the .inf file that is included with the driver and
selecting install does nothing apparent - perhaps it is installing
cannotdriver but because plug and play is not detecting the monitor Iessentialsee the driver.But the installation of your video card or display adaptor is
I have downloaded the Monitor Asset Manager and will see what it
shows.
Then you will definately need to get the drivers for your video card andSettings shows the display as Default Monitor and if I click onIf you know the exact model of your motherboardif you want to get it working. I'd really concentrate on that first.All I know is that the motherboard has a built in adapter using the
If your video card cannot be set to 1440 x 900
there is nothing monitor related you can do to make it so
UniChrome graphics engine according to the Gigabyte website. There is
no adapter showing up in the hardware list.
you should ber able to go to the website and download the correct driver
for your on-board graphics...
once that;s installed, hopefully things will get better.
Just out of curiosity.
what does it show if you right click on the desktop
and look at properties ===> settings ?
Advanced then there is no Adapter tab and the Monitor tab gives a
Monitor type of Default Monitor and the Properties button is shown as
disabled (grayed out)
install them...
that should sort things out
Installed the Viaarena driver that Paul suggested and lo and behold, I
now have Adapter and Monitor tabs in Settings/Advanced. Furthermore,
plug n play now detects the Benq monitor.
I then installed the Q900W driver for the monitor but I still cannot
get 1440x900 resolution. The resolution options are the same as
before.
Any ideas as to what to try next?
I'm not sure there are a lot of options left. It would help if I could
understand why the Openchrome driver has fixed dotclock values for that
chip. Normally, video devices have programmable registers for all that
stuff, programmable to multiples of 8 bits horizontally and multiples
of 2 bits vertically (some manage to do horizontal down to the nearest
bit). But the driver is all that you get as a user, and you cannot
know what the real capabilities are, with only the control panel to
go by. It doesn't seem to be a DAC limit, as there is one resolution
above 1440x900 that is supported.
(It is posslble, but I cannot make any guarantees, that you could
convince Linux to run the screen at 1440x900. I'd try something like
a Knoppix CD, as on the command line you could try "knoppix screen=1440x900".
All that such an experiment would prove, is that the KM400 is not
the limitation to achieving 1440x900.)
If Powerstrip worked with built-in video, there'd be another option.
But for the most part, Powerstrip works with ATI or Nvidia add-in
video cards. Chipset support is spotty, and I don't think VIA is
included.
1280x768 might be the closest resolution that is under the 1440x900
limit.
If you look in the monitor driver folder (on the CD) and open the
INF with a text editor, you should see 1440x900 being added as
a registry value. I'd just double check and see whether the Benq
INF file has done that or not. It probably has.
The Viaarena site used to have a forum, and using a search engine,
I can find references to such issues. But, for some reason, the
forum was moved to "tkforums.com", and I don't understand the reason
for that. That busted the ability for me to read the responses of people
dealing with the issue. It means the people who posted hard fought
information to viaarena, had it thrown away by uncaring admins.
One of the reasons I hate private sites!
(Another example would be the Matrox forums, where if they wanted,
they could have left the forum read-only, so anyone wanting the information
could have access to it.)
Paul
.
- References:
- Plug and Play detection of Monitor
- From: Ken
- Re: Plug and Play detection of Monitor
- From: Paul
- Re: Plug and Play detection of Monitor
- From: Ken
- Re: Plug and Play detection of Monitor
- From: philo
- Re: Plug and Play detection of Monitor
- From: Ken
- Re: Plug and Play detection of Monitor
- From: philo
- Re: Plug and Play detection of Monitor
- From: Ken
- Re: Plug and Play detection of Monitor
- From: philo
- Re: Plug and Play detection of Monitor
- From: Ken
- Plug and Play detection of Monitor
- Prev by Date: Re: Defragment flash drive on Vista
- Next by Date: Re: USB write protected.
- Previous by thread: Re: Plug and Play detection of Monitor
- Next by thread: Re: Plug and Play detection of Monitor
- Index(es):