Re: hardware raid 1, 5 question
Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance
That would depend on your raid controler, in the order of $300+ for a decent
one
"ToddAndMargo" <ToddAndMargo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eLGnp39UIHA.2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Question: in general, when using hardware raid,
is raid 1 any faster, slower or the same as raid 5?
Many thanks,
-T
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: SQL Server 2000 Performance - 10K vs. 15K
... Not a lot slower, but still slower -- and you know ... Log files and data files on separate raid ... OS and Log array is RAID 1 on channel 0, ...
(microsoft.public.sqlserver.setup) - Re: SQL Server 2000 Performance - 10K vs. 15K
... Not a lot slower, but still slower -- and you know ... Log files and data files on separate raid ... OS and Log array is RAID 1 on channel 0, ...
(microsoft.public.sqlserver.setup) - Re: RAID for backup. RAID 5 or RAID 1?
... > probably is a bit slower then internal harddisks. ... >>> Should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 1? ... >>> Marshall ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs) - Re: [SLE] is Raid 1 (mirror) so slow ?
... I want to use RAID 5 using 3 HD but this will cost me more. ... Software RAID level 1 is slower than 1 harddisk? ... Writing and Reading ...
(SuSE) - Re: Raid and SBS 2003
... Writes can be slower but reads are about the same speed as RAID 0 ... > Such is NOT slower than writing to single disk if a hardware RAID ... >> then compute the parity and stripe it across the lot of disks as well ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs) |
|
