Re: XP Home on a quad?

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

....so what was all the fuss about KB896256 backalong ?

....in as many words MS say in this KB that :-
"...you may experience decreased performance ...something to do with power
saving / ACPI...?"

....so I stuffed in the KB896256 patch anyway :-)

regards, Richard



"Paul" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:ffj9f1$hgg$1@xxxxxxxxxxx
***** charles wrote:
Can I infer from your answer since you didn't say yes or no,
that a quad cpu will show all four cores/threads in task
manager?

later.....

I like this thread, even if it doesn't provide a URL to where this
description came from:

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=42204

"Many differences exist between Windows XP Home and Windows XP
Professional
? many of them well-documented. One of the most significant is XP's
support
for multiple physical processors. As two- and four-processor
workstations
(not just servers) become more common, whether or not they're supported
by
the operating system running on them in the first place is critical.

While Windows XP Home does not support more than one physical
processor,
there's a lot of confusion about whether or not it supports multiple
processor
cores in a single physical processor. This is implemented in several
ways, of
which the most widely used is Intel's Hyper-Threading technology. Also,
AMD is
currently rolling out a series of 64-bit processors called the X2 dual
core
series, which features two processor cores per die.

How much of this is supported? The answer is all of it -- in XP
Professional,
and, surprisingly enough, in XP Home as well. If you install XP Home on
a system
that has a single processor with dual cores or hyper-threading (what is
referred
to as two logical processors) XP Home will recognize both of them, and
will install
the appropriate Hardware Abstraction Layer (HAL) to work with it.

However, if you have more than one physical processor (such as two
dual-core or
Hyper-Threading processors), XP Home will only recognize the first one.
Note: If
you enable hyper-threading on a machine on which Windows is already
installed, the
HAL will be automatically upgraded (if it hasn't been already) and
you'll be prompted
to reboot a second time to finalize those changes.

Microsoft's official word about multiple processors across all its
products is that
they are licensed by physical processor socket, not by the number of
cores on each
processor. For instance, if you buy a single-CPU license for SQL Server
2005, that
license is valid no matter how many cores are in that one CPU.
Likewise, Windows XP
Home will only work with one socket at a time regardless of its cores
or threading
potential, and XP Professional will recognize up to two sockets."

and further in that thread...

"Windows 2000 Professional will only recognize 2 CPUS/Cores/HT, no more"

They also provided this ref:

http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/highlights/multicore.mspx

So it looks like a quad core and WinXP Home will still work, and all four
cores can
be occupied. Meaning you can run FSX SP1 or try some of the stuff they've
run in
this article: http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/12737/6

I found the text blurb above probably originated here. But since this site
puts up
adverts before you can read the article, I wouldn't bother clicking this
link.

http://searchwincomputing.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid68_gci1189223,00.html

Paul


"Bob I" <birelan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:O5HMAhOFIHA.1316@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The operative term is socket. One socket = one CPU. As far as making
efficient use of them well it isn't optimized for that.

***** charles wrote:

Hey,

Can XP Home see and use all the cores in a quad core cpu?

later......




.

Relevant Pages

  • Windows 7 Boasts Better Multi-core, Support for up to 256 Cores
    ... Windows 7 Boasts Better Multi-core, Support for up to 256 Cores ... Microsoft is ready to put the Windows Vista era behind it and is moving on ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: AnandTech likes the Mac Pro
    ... for a 'quad core' workstation (given that Windows doesn't scale well ... even to dual cores, let alone quad cores). ... CSMA and mac universe is fluffcake territory. ... count as real work in my book) and wants to show Dad that he does not run ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: AnandTech likes the Mac Pro
    ... for a 'quad core' workstation (given that Windows doesn't scale well ... even to dual cores, let alone quad cores). ... CSMA and mac universe is fluffcake territory. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Processing Multiple Large Files
    ... I should probably have used threads on Windows. ... $ time perl process.pl 0 ... and if you have at least two cores (most current computers ... cache, and even if they do, they probably aren't in the cache when his ...
    (comp.lang.perl.misc)
  • Re: XP Home on a quad?
    ... "Many differences exist between Windows XP Home and Windows XP Professional ... While Windows XP Home does not support more than one physical processor, ... which features two processor cores per die. ... license is valid no matter how many cores are in that one CPU. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)