Re: New PCI IDE controller or new mainboard - advice needed
- From: "George Valkov" <a@xxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 03:05:15 +0300
"Yves Leclerc" wrote:
There are few, and less, motherboards that have separate IDE port. MostWhen I purchased the two new IDE disks 2 months ago, I had to maintain
now
come with SATA only.
compatibility with my mainboard. I also prefered to stick to the old and
aproved IDE.
Yes and that`s why the two disks that host RAID stripes are the two master
The reason that you performance is low is:
1) Software RAID -- This take Windows resources and slows every thing
down,
whenever the RAID stripe is verified/rebuilt.
2) Slave Drives -- Each IDE cable can only read/write one drive drive at a
time. So if the slave drive needs to read from /written to, the previous
request need to stop or complete, This is why when setting up a software
RAID
on IDE, most power users usually only place one drive (Master) per IDE
cable.
No slave drive used.
devices.
I realise that and that`s the reason I wanted to have four IDE channels -
this alows four devices working as master.
The mainboard does not have RAID. A friend of mine (hardware PC programmer),
told me that when BIOS finds a PCI card, it will send control to its BIOS
and this will alow me to have a RAID BIOS for the new PCI IDE controller,
from where I will be able to build the RAID stripe. Right?
Then windows should discover the controller and install drivers for it.
I will also be able to install windows on the RAID stripe, won`t I?
As for set up servers with RAID (mirror or stripe,) I mostly recommend
SCSI or
SATA configurations. SCSI based configurations allow multiple
reads/writes at
the same time and SATA configurations, each drive is directly cabled to
one
SATA port. No Master/Slave configurations on the same cable.
This is good to know! Soon I won`t have any slave devices, so I guess I will
be fine with IDE too. SCSI is a high performance interface for high-end
servers. A good PCI IDE card with RAID will be just enough for my
home-server.
On 12/10/2006 "George Valkov" <a@xxxxx> wrote:
When I access two IDE devices on a same channel, performance is low. I
have
four devices and only two slots, so two of the devices are slave.
Primary master and secondary master are two new hard-disks, same type,
dynamic disks with software STRIPE partitions. Primary Slave is
DVD-burner.
Secondary slave is the boot hard-disk.
What would you recomend me?
a/ Buy a new mainboard with four IDE channels?
+ it will support AGP8 (the current mainboard supports AGP4)
- is more expensive
- I may have problems activating windows 2003 ent server
b/ Buy a new PCI IDE controller?
+ it will support hardware RAID / STRIPE and I will probably be able to
boot from it (I currently use a software STRIPE on two dynamic disks).
+ It is cheaper
- I may have problems activating windows 2003 ent server
There will be 4 IDE devices and a 4 PCI devies changing its location. Two
of
which are LAN cards. Should I notify Microsoft before changing the
locations
of the hardware, so that they expect the hardware changes and activate
windows for me? I don`t care If I have to reinstall windows.
details:
/dev/hda : [0,0] Segate Baracuda 320GB 16 MB cache 7200rpm DMA5
/dev/hda : [0,1] Plextor PX-760A 2MB cache DMA4
/dev/hdc : [1,0] Segate Baracuda 320GB 16 MB cache 7200rpm DMA5
/dev/hdd : [1,1] Segate 40GB 2 MB cache 5400rpm DMA5
Thank you for any advice!
--
---
Y.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- New PCI IDE controller or new mainboard - advice needed
- From: George Valkov
- Re: New PCI IDE controller or new mainboard - advice needed
- From: Yves Leclerc
- New PCI IDE controller or new mainboard - advice needed
- Prev by Date: Re: no sound
- Next by Date: Re: Interchanging master hd's
- Previous by thread: Re: New PCI IDE controller or new mainboard - advice needed
- Next by thread: Re: New PCI IDE controller or new mainboard - advice needed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading