Re: AMD vs Intel

The X2 that I am running will outperform whatever Intel chip you are
running.

Bobby


"Ryan" <Ryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:D1F38A80-175F-4A77-BB8B-21BD41B2BC41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The real sad thing is, it must suck that it's a damn shame you have to run
a
no good AMD X2 chip.

Do us all a favor and toss that chip in the landfill like I told you
before.

"NoNoBadDog!" wrote:

Your comments are also of no value. You "retaliate" against those whose
opinions differ from yours by claiming they are losers and then pretend
to
know what kind of processor they are running. You did that to Bob I and
you
said the same thing to me.

You are an infantile, conceited idiot that cannot see more than one side
of
any discussion.

It's too bad you'll never know what it is like to have an open mind. You
are too stupid to realize that you may be wrong. You are to egotistical
to
be able to admit it you are wrong.

It must suck being you.

Bobby


"Ryan" <Ryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:FDE1FFC6-ED03-44AA-9CAA-7C4605934C1C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Well, for someone who claims this thread is "nothing but wasted space"
must
obviously feel this thread is still worthy to continue to comment on
this
thread.

Isn't that kind of strange? But then again, all of your comments on
this
thread have been strange and merit no value.

Go figure: an AMD loser stuck on his low end, pathetic XP Athlon chip.


"Bob I" wrote:

You got the wording slightly jumbled, correct phrasing would be. "This
thread is nothing but wasted space."

Ryan wrote:

Your first impression proved nothing. Just nothing but wasted space
on
this
thread.

"Bob I" wrote:


Obviously my first impression of your awareness was right on the
money,
and you certainly haven't learned a thing since then.


Ryan wrote:


Bob,

Just give it up. You are completely lost. No one mentioned anything
remotely
about an "issue" in this thread.

We are merely exchanging opinions regarding XP related hardware.

If you can't see that, as you have already shown, you need to get
your
head
out of your rear end.

"Bob I" wrote:



Explain myself?!?!
1. You apparently haven't the first clue about what comprises a
debate.
and
2. It has as much to do with XP as the mains power cord.
and
3. Just because its a CPU doesn't make it an XP issue.


Ryan wrote:



Bob,

What makes you think this thread is pointless? I think this
thread
makes
good debate. This is a public forum addressing XP related
hardware.
And the
CPU is the heart of a computer. How can that be pointless?

Explain yourself.

"Bob I" wrote:




No, this is a pointless thread, and is OT.

Ryan wrote:




OK, Kerry, I would not say this is a ridiculous thread. The
relevance behind
this thread is to make everyone aware that Intel has regained
the
performance
crown that has been AMD's for quite some time.

Sure, each new chip will succeed others, but the difference in
Conroe is
that it put Intel back on top. It put AMD back in 2nd place
where
it belongs.

"Kerry Brown" wrote:





Ryan wrote:




For all you hardcore AMD fans, you better start crying. Your
AMD
processors are eating Intel's dust.

The spring Intel going on now clearly demonstrates that
Intel's
new
Conroe chip beats the pants off of AMD's FX dual core chip.

These are just preliminary benchmarks. Just wait till this
chip
release in Sept. AMD stands no chance.

According to many websites, the new yet to be release M2
series
from
AMD will not make a difference in benchmarks.

Intel is back on top.

What a ridiculous thread. It's a target that no one will ever
hit. As each
new CPU comes out it will be better than what came before. So
what! How long
have you been using computers?

Kerry













.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: AMD vs Intel
    ... Intel just came out with Presler. ... to release a chip now in March when they just came out with a new chip in ... If Intel had a chip that could best AMD by 20%, do you think they would sit ... I won't run out and buy a Conroe when they are released. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: AMD vs Intel
    ... You did that to Bob I and you ... an AMD loser stuck on his low end, pathetic XP Athlon chip. ... Ryan wrote: ... that it put Intel back on top. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: INTC a good buy?
    ... And another AMD fanboy spreading false information on usenet, ... less power than the new Intel models. ... getting the very fastest Intel chip, then the fastest AMD chip (and ... with a very old single core chip with a new dual core chip. ...
    (misc.invest.stocks)
  • Re: AMD vs Intel
    ... an AMD loser stuck on his low end, pathetic XP Athlon chip. ... "Bob I" wrote: ... Ryan wrote: ... that it put Intel back on top. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: AMD vs Intel
    ... "Bob I" wrote: ... Ryan wrote: ... that it put Intel back on top. ... Conroe chip beats the pants off of AMD's FX dual core chip. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
Loading