Re: AMD vs Intel

Obviously my first impression of your awareness was right on the money, and you certainly haven't learned a thing since then.


Ryan wrote:

Bob,

Just give it up. You are completely lost. No one mentioned anything remotely about an "issue" in this thread.

We are merely exchanging opinions regarding XP related hardware.

If you can't see that, as you have already shown, you need to get your head out of your rear end.

"Bob I" wrote:


Explain myself?!?!
1. You apparently haven't the first clue about what comprises a debate.
and
2. It has as much to do with XP as the mains power cord.
and
3. Just because its a CPU doesn't make it an XP issue.


Ryan wrote:


Bob,

What makes you think this thread is pointless? I think this thread makes good debate. This is a public forum addressing XP related hardware. And the CPU is the heart of a computer. How can that be pointless?

Explain yourself.

"Bob I" wrote:



No, this is a pointless thread, and is OT.

Ryan wrote:



OK, Kerry, I would not say this is a ridiculous thread. The relevance behind this thread is to make everyone aware that Intel has regained the performance crown that has been AMD's for quite some time.

Sure, each new chip will succeed others, but the difference in Conroe is that it put Intel back on top. It put AMD back in 2nd place where it belongs.

"Kerry Brown" wrote:




Ryan wrote:



For all you hardcore AMD fans, you better start crying. Your AMD
processors are eating Intel's dust.

The spring Intel going on now clearly demonstrates that Intel's new
Conroe chip beats the pants off of AMD's FX dual core chip.

These are just preliminary benchmarks. Just wait till this chip
release in Sept. AMD stands no chance.

According to many websites, the new yet to be release M2 series from
AMD will not make a difference in benchmarks.

Intel is back on top.

What a ridiculous thread. It's a target that no one will ever hit. As each new CPU comes out it will be better than what came before. So what! How long have you been using computers?

Kerry







.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: AMD vs Intel
    ... You did that to Bob I and you ... an AMD loser stuck on his low end, pathetic XP Athlon chip. ... Ryan wrote: ... that it put Intel back on top. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: AMD vs Intel
    ... an AMD loser stuck on his low end, pathetic XP Athlon chip. ... "Bob I" wrote: ... Ryan wrote: ... that it put Intel back on top. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: AMD vs Intel
    ... "Bob I" wrote: ... Ryan wrote: ... that it put Intel back on top. ... Conroe chip beats the pants off of AMD's FX dual core chip. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: AMD vs Intel
    ... Ryan wrote: ... "Bob I" wrote: ... Sure, each new chip will succeed others, but the difference in Conroe is that it put Intel back on top. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: Question on old chips
    ... Ryan wrote: ... I am wondering which chip is faster. ... > reading a lot saying that the Cyrix MII chip is a 250 mhz chip, ... hence the 'II' as in Pentium II. ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips)