Re: SATA Raid Question

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

I realize the requirement for backups & protection for AV, spyware,
firewall, etc.

However, I run several databases, websites & do graphics work which need to
be always available to me - with the low price of disks, a RAID 1 does all
this along with the ease of continued operations. My backup is kept on a
file server on my network.

I understand what RAID 0 & RAID 1 are and the advantages of each and have
considered whether or not I even want a RAID - I have chosen to go with RAID
1 for data.

Larry

"Glen" <gp2002hw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OiKFmnUOGHA.348@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You should rethink using RAID 1. All a RAID 1 will protect you from is a
failed hard drive. You won't be protected against viruses or anything wich
corrupts data except a failed hard drive. You will still need a complete
backup. RAID 1 is really meant for companies who can't afford any downtime
that a failed hard drive would bring. If there are any problems they just
switch to the alternate hard drive. I use RAID 0 and have a backup. That
way I get the speed boost and am protected against failure.

Read and understand exactely what a RAID 1 will give you before going
ahead. I don't think thery are worth the expense for home users. A proper
backup gives you compleate protection whereas a RAID 1 only protects
against failed hard drive, think about it.

If you don't mind me asking why are you thinking about RAID 1.
--
Please repost if you find the fault

Glen P
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Lawrence E. Oliver" <oliverlAT@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u20tE9MOGHA.2624@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Just a curious question from someone who is completely untutored in Raid
setup.

I am building a new Intel mobo system with integrated hardware raid. I
intend to use three disks - 1st for "operating system" & 2nd & 3rd for a
Raid1 setup for "data". Where do you recommend the installation of
"programs" - 1st or 2nd/3rd?

Larry






.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: RAID newbie...can I have several partitions on a RAID 1 array?
    ... With current backup ... argument for raid in those cases goes beyond the protection mechanism. ... against any & every kind of failure or failing media. ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage)
  • Re: raid 1 vs raid 5
    ... Enterprise Manager backup jobs. ... a standby SQL server with the database & logfile drives mirrored ... Message is that the best RAID redundancy in no is the only protection you ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.setup)
  • Re: Your Recommendations on these two product lines
    ... I'm not familiar with RAID 5 so I'll leave it for someone else to comment on, but I'm using a RAID1 setup and can't be happier. ... What your client needs depends on whether they need a server with a RAID controller or just a NAS with integrated RAID. ... As for backup software, I personally request getting Symantec Backup Exec 12.5 for Small Business. ... I need to have a fairly good idea of what really works before I recommend to my clients. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: SATA Raid Question
    ... You should rethink using RAID 1. ... All a RAID 1 will protect you from is a ... I use RAID 0 and have a backup. ... Raid1 setup for "data". ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: RAIDING different size drives
    ... failure regardless of what what happens when part of it fails. ... Having no experience with windows software raid, I did not know if there were any complications involved. ... But I am now happy to hear that recovery from failure in this situation is straightforward, and therefore this sort of raid setup does offer useful protection. ... That's why testing your restore procedure is so vital - many people believe they have good backup procedures, but have problems when they have to do a restore. ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage)