Re: 48Bit LBA Question
- From: "Snarky Parker" <sparker9@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 14:03:08 -0500
That would be correct if you use the NTFS format. See this article for
limitations when using FAT32:
Limitations of the FAT32 File System in Windows XP
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314463/EN-US/
"Jim Stuart" <xyzzyy25@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OMWHIinKGHA.3984@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| So as I understand it, it's not 137GB per partition but the total of all
| partitions (Primary and Logical) can not exceed 137GB for any hard drive
| connected to my PC.
|
| Jim
|
|
| "Jim Stuart" <xyzzyy25@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:eXYUmxeKGHA.964@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >I have an older PC running Windows XP SP2 that does not support 48Bit LBA.
| >I would like to install a 160GB hard drive as a replacement for two smaller
| >drives.
| >
| > If I create a primary partition (15GB) for the OS and an extended
| > partition containing a number of logical partitions non of which are
| > greater than 30GB will I run into any problems? I plan to move the
| > existing OS over to the new drive using Ghost.
| >
| > Jim
| >
|
|
.
- References:
- 48Bit LBA Question
- From: Jim Stuart
- Re: 48Bit LBA Question
- From: Jim Stuart
- 48Bit LBA Question
- Prev by Date: Re: Event ID 51, USB 2.0 HDD not responding properly (internal WD 160
- Next by Date: Re: pci input device error
- Previous by thread: Re: 48Bit LBA Question
- Next by thread: Re: 48Bit LBA Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
