Re: Help me too choose AMD or Intel ???
- From: "GF" <personne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 09:31:42 -0400
Very good.
But : I have one problem with my AtiX300. I cannot get
a satisfying image on my TV (using the TV out connection).
It is monochrome. I have tried every setting available, but
to no avail.
On my previous baord with a Nvidia AGP - an inexpensive
Asus graphic board, everything was perfect. I do not
know how the version of the Nvidia board you mention
performs.
"serge calderara" <sergecalderara@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le
message de news: BD3AFCCA-1F13-4F30-9E17-E08D5012A9F2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> hi,
>
> Most system I have seen in shops around are providing the following
> configuration
> AMD processor 64 3200
> Embeded graphic cards ATi X300 or NVIDIA turbo cach 6200 256 mB
>
> 200Gb hD 700rpm
> 1Gb of DDRAM
>
> What do you think of that configuration ?
>
> regards
> "Kerry Brown" wrote:
>
>>
>> "NoNoBadDog!" <no_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:%23NejBEVpFHA.4008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> <SNIP>
>>
>> > Intel is currently so far behind the game when it comes to producing 64
>> > bit CPU's, yet everyone seems to continue to defend them. Every review
>> > I
>> > have read that pits Intel EM64T against AMD Athlon64, the Athlon wins
>> > (by
>> > a large margin).
>> >
>> > If you are savvy, do research, and put you money where the speed, power
>> > and value are, the only answer is AMD. Perhaps in a year or two, once
>> > Intel begins selling newer designed chips instead of re-vamped P4J
>> > CPUs,
>> > they may again be "king of the hill". But for now, the smart money is
>> > on
>> > AMD.
>> >
>>
>> While I agree the current crop of AMD CPU's are technically better than
>> Intel's in the real world I see little or no performance difference that
>> a
>> normal user would notice. I stand by my comments that using good ram,
>> motherboard, PSU and video card will make much more of a difference to
>> the
>> average end user. System stability and reliability are far more important
>> for most people than that last 5% speed improvement. I have seen many
>> systems that use the latest CPU only to cheap out on other components and
>> have a horrible system that barely runs. The CPU is only one component of
>> a
>> system. To take advantage of the Athlon 64 the rest of the components
>> have
>> to be up to the task. This negates the price difference between the CPU's
>> making the overall system price for an equally performing system very
>> close.
>>
>> I agree that if 64 bit is what you want or need then AMD blows Intel
>> away. I
>> just don't see that presently, in the real world not in a benchmark, it
>> offers that much of a speed advantage over 32 bit chips. By the time the
>> software catches up there will be a whole new crop of CPU's out. At that
>> time who knows which will be better.
>>
>> All that said most of the systems I sell either have a Celeron CPU (word
>> processing machine) or a 939 Athlon 64 (game, graphics, or power user
>> machine) for desktops. For notebooks Intel has won the advertising war
>> and
>> everyone wants Centrino even if they don't know exactly what it is :-)
>>
>> Kerry
>>
>>
>>
.
- References:
- Help me too choose AMD or Intel ???
- From: serge calderara
- Re: Help me too choose AMD or Intel ???
- From: Kerry Brown
- Re: Help me too choose AMD or Intel ???
- From: NoNoBadDog!
- Re: Help me too choose AMD or Intel ???
- From: Kerry Brown
- Re: Help me too choose AMD or Intel ???
- From: serge calderara
- Help me too choose AMD or Intel ???
- Prev by Date: Re: Help me too choose AMD or Intel ???
- Next by Date: Re: Motherboard Problem?
- Previous by thread: Re: Help me too choose AMD or Intel ???
- Next by thread: Re: Help me too choose AMD or Intel ???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|