Re: NTFS or FAT32 on 100GB partition (Win2000Pro)
- From: Sharon F <sharonfDEL@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 12:46:11 -0500
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005 15:02:00 +0200, Bun wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> Is it safe to format HardDisc larger then 100GB with FAT32 filesystem???
> I'm going to install new 160GB drive and i dont know what kind of file
> system i have to choice.
> I will make there three partitons. First (about 40GB) for system, second
> (about 2GB) for Win's virtual memory and thrird (about 110GB) for data. But
> I dont know in what kind of file system, i have to format them. I want to
> format all partitions with FAT32, because i still dont know if i will
> install there W98SE or Win2000.
>
> THX
> Bun
It's possible to format a large drive using FAT32 but there would be an
enormous amount of waste with the resulting cluster size. One of the
reasons that XP will not *create* a FAT32 partition larger than 32GB is due
to this efficiency factor.
NOTE: XP can work with FAT32 partitions larger than 32GB but it will not
create them.
Description of Default Cluster Size for FAT32 File System:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=192322
Also, there is no good reason or performance gain dedicating a partition on
the same hard drive for the system's pagefile. An informative article about
virtual memory in XP: http://www.aumha.org/win5/a/xpvm.htm
If you have a program such as PhotoShop, that likes having its own scratch
file, a small partition could be used for that purpose. Photoshop will work
without a dedicated scratch file area. Just be sure to leave plenty of
empty and contiguous space for the program to use.
--
Sharon F
MS-MVP ~ Windows Shell/User
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: toshiba laptop
- Next by Date: Re: XP shared network printer nightmare
- Previous by thread: NTFS or FAT32 on 100GB partition (Win2000Pro)
- Next by thread: Re: NTFS or FAT32 on 100GB partition (Win2000Pro)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|