Re: ATI Radeon 9600se VS ATI X300se



You pretty well summed it up Ron.
However, if Phil's motherboard only has PCI Express slot he should be aware
of a major limitation- the wattage of his power supply. I opted for the ATI
300SE because I only have a 300 watt power supply in my system. Also the
higher end PCIex cards burn much hotter- think about system cooling. In my
case my MSI MB already has an ATI 200 PCIexpress chip integrated in it, the
separate video card freed up my RAM and CPU more and I maxed up my RAM to 2
GB dual channel memory. The video streaming is awesome!

"Ron Martell" wrote:

> "Phil" <no@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >Can someone tell me the difference between ATI Radeon 9600se VS ATI X300se
> >and how they perform in games under XP?
> >
> >Both have 128 megs of ram.
> >
> >Thanks for all the info. I am new at this.
> >
>
> The Radeon 9600 series are medium to high end graphics adapter for a
> computer that uses AGP graphics cards. They have 8x AGP speed, which
> is the fastest that is generally available. They are not as high
> performance as the ATI 9800 series. The 9600 series consists of 3
> models insofar as I can discover - the 9600, the 9600 Pro, and the
> 9600 XT. I do not see a 9600SE model listed.
>
> The X300 series is an entry level graphics adapter for a computer that
> uses the new PCI Express 16 cards. PCI Express is, by design, at
> least twice as fast as AGP. ATI lists 4 other series of PCI Express
> cards that are higher perfomance than the X300.
>
>
> Note that there is no computer that I am aware that incorporates the
> ability to use both the AGP and the PCI Express 16 cards. It is an
> "either or" situation. So if your computer supports PCI Express 16
> then your considerations should be directed towards the X300 and other
> PCI Express type video cards. AGP cards will not work in these
> computers. Note that computers that use PCI Express 16 video cards
> have only been generally available for less than a year, and many new
> computers being sold today still have not moved to the new standard.
>
> And if your computer supports AGP video cards then your considerations
> should be directed towards the Radeon 9600 series and other 8X rated
> AGP cards (provided your computer can operate AGP cards at 8X speed.
> Computers more than a year or so old are likely to only support 4X AGP
> and therefore a lot of the performance capabilites of an 8X AGP card
> would be wasted in such a computer.
>
> Good luck
>
>
> Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
> --
> Microsoft MVP
> On-Line Help Computer Service
> http://onlinehelp.bc.ca
>
> "The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much."
>
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: AGP or PCI
    ... I think they are saying AGP "replaces" PCI in the context of graphic ... cards, because it's more effective - but you can use a PCI graphics ... card instead of an AGP graphics card. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: upgrade time
    ... We are a dealer and have the most experience selling ASUS boards. ... then go for PCI Express. ... If you have an older AGP video card ... any video cards available today that surpass the AGP 2.1GB/s bandwidth ...
    (alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus)
  • Re: LOTRO graphics card
    ... be burnt at a stake for manufacturing a machine without AGP or PCI-E ... 256MB PCI cards out there. ... adding/changing memory, and if you get failures swap slots and try ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg)
  • Re: Trouble getting video cards to work
    ... On Tuesday 04 Jan 2005 05:37, Jonathan Berry wrote: ... >> The computer is an old Dell without an AGP slot. ... >> cards I have tried have already been developed. ... > can find both AGP and PCI versions for not too much. ...
    (Fedora)
  • SP2 BSOD with 2 Video cards!
    ... I've been running XP for quite a while with 2 video cards ... one AGP and one PCI. ... I no longer have 2 screens! ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment)