Re: Why 'Default Monitor'?
- From: "Sleepless in Seattle" <jonah@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 22:06:49 +1200
Maybe you could wave a magic wand as it would do as much good. Do you think
every different brand uses different timing? WRONG and totally pointless.
--
Jonah
"Terry Pinnell" <terrypinDELETE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5pik515bifmi60ess2n2os6dc9qr6i7g4p@xxxxxxxxxx
> OK, thanks, managed to sort this a while later. The key step I'd
> missed when using the Update Driver dialog was to uncheck the 'Show
> compatible devices' box. Seems sort of counter-intuitive to me, as I'd
> have thought I *did* want XP to use 'compatible' monitors! But anyway,
> on removing that, a full list appeared, from which I selected my
> IIyama VisionMaster.
>
> Can't say it's made any visible difference (still using same
> resolution and same 85 Hz refresh rate), but maybe there's some subtle
> improvement?
>
> --
> Terry, West Sussex, UK
>
.
- References:
- Why 'Default Monitor'?
- From: Terry Pinnell
- Re: Why 'Default Monitor'?
- From: Terry Pinnell
- Why 'Default Monitor'?
- Prev by Date: RE: No help from BenQ website.
- Next by Date: Re: Isolating bad cylinders???
- Previous by thread: Re: Why 'Default Monitor'?
- Next by thread: "My Bluetooth Places" not working
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|