Re: USB2 v/s USB in XP - help?
From: Jim Macklin (p51mustang[threeX12)
Date: 01/04/05
- Next message: Yves Leclerc: "Re: USB2 v/s USB in XP - help?"
- Previous message: Frank: "Re: How do "Big Name" machines respond to generic XP OEM disks?"
- In reply to: yabbadoo: "USB2 v/s USB in XP - help?"
- Next in thread: Yves Leclerc: "Re: USB2 v/s USB in XP - help?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:27:06 -0600
Use a program such as EVEREST from www.lavalys.com to
identify the exact make/model of the motherboard. Get the
mobo manual to determine any special requirements of the USB
built-in the mobo. You want to know if any of the ports are
shared.
Also, use the device manager to remove ALL USB ports and
hubs and then reboot. The system should identify all the
ports and the new card as "new" and install the best
drivers. With SP2 installed, you should then have USB 2.0.
BTW USB 1.1 is ten times faster than 1.0, USB 2.0 is 40
times faster than 1.1 (480 mbps).
-- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. "yabbadoo" <lsdolby@ignore.ntlwor.com> wrote in message news:ui7aYDp8EHA.1564@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... | OS is XP SP2 fully up-to-date. Motherboard has USB on-board, 2 front, 2 | rear. Processor is Athlon 1.533Ghz, 760 mb RAM | | PROBLEM - just installed USB2 PCI card, which appears to work (adding 2 USB2 | ports to the rear). Also bought USB2 4 port hub, to allow flexible | connectivity. | Initially, rear ports on card worked, but connecting the hub to one of | these, and a USB2 memory stick into the hub, resulted in the "this will work | faster in USB2" message. Tried the MS download site for updated driver | (zilch), but by some miracle, after two re-boots, system now appears to be | working correctly (meaning - no more "this will work faster" message). | Installation CD had text file saying MS SP1 had appropriate drivers - not to | use the CD for XP. | | As a test, I copyied a 120mb file in both USB and USB2 mode. There's | virtually no difference in the transfer time (about 3 minutes). I thought | the whole point of USB2 was that it was 10 times quicker. I now have 4 USB | ports on the motherboard | | Am I missing something? What should the transfer time be for 120mb in USB | and USB2? Reason for the question is that I don't know whether USB2 is | actually working (if so, why are USB ports apparently working at same | speed?) | |
- Next message: Yves Leclerc: "Re: USB2 v/s USB in XP - help?"
- Previous message: Frank: "Re: How do "Big Name" machines respond to generic XP OEM disks?"
- In reply to: yabbadoo: "USB2 v/s USB in XP - help?"
- Next in thread: Yves Leclerc: "Re: USB2 v/s USB in XP - help?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|