Re: Upgrading processor or motherboard better?
From: Jim Macklin (p51mustang[threeX12)
Date: 11/21/04
- Next message: Jim Macklin: "Re: Top of the line hardware?"
- Previous message: Bob Harris: "Re: After Defrag, Win XP External Drive all of the sudden has I/O error, and I cannot access it"
- In reply to: Shenan Stanley: "Re: Upgrading processor or motherboard better?"
- Next in thread: *vik*: "Re: Upgrading processor or motherboard better?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 09:33:17 -0600
Yes, I did miss that, but I don't think that even the 500
MHz jump is a worthwhile cost when you add in the cost of
other upgrades needed to get the performance he wants. At
some point a new computer becomes more cost effective.
The OP can do "their thing" but I was playing Devil's
Advocate so that all the factors would be in mind.
Thanks for pointing out my error, I just shouldn't read late
at night.
-- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. "Shenan Stanley" <news_helper@hushmail.com> wrote in message news:%23f7xG$7zEHA.3584@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... | Vik wrote: | > Hi, I have a motherboard with a 800mhz duron processor, | > I am reading my motherboard manual here & it says it supports AMD | > Athlon 600mhz-1.33ghz processor, or AMD Duron 600mhz-850mhz | > processor. Since I have the 800mhz Duron would it make much | > difference in speed if I changed my processor to the faster Athlon | > or would it be better to get a new motherboard & a faster | > processor, I don't use my computer for 3d games but do a bit of | > dvd & photo editing & don't want to spend too much on upgrading | > due to lack of cash, lol | > | > So basically, is a processor upgrade by itself worth the hassle? | | Jim Macklin wrote: | > A 50 MHz boost in CPU speed will be nearly invisible in your | > use. A new mobo and CPU will likely also need new RAM so | > you are looking at about $200-250 to get a truly useful | > speed boost. I suggest you save your money for now and buy | > a more modern system. The old 850 MHz CPU will probably | > cost MORE than a 2 GHz CPU since it is now becoming more | > scarce due to being long out of production. | > | > You might investigate more RAM and over-clocking, you might | > get a boost to 900 MHz -1 GHz out of your 800 MHz machine. | > The RAM would have to support the faster FSB speed and you | > would have to adjust your CPU multiplier...A faster hard | > drive would also speed up your computer and would be the one | > item that could be used with a really new machine. | > | > On a older system most of the hardware will not upgrade | > well. For video/graphics editing a big hard drive is very | > useful and the newer 7200 RPM with 8 NB buffer HD are faster | > than what you now likely have. | | Jim, | | You missed the fact the OP posted concerning the ATHLON processors the | current board accepted. Yes, the OP could go from an 800 Duron to a 850 | Duron, but they could also go to a 1.33ghz Athlon. 500MHz jump in speed. | | -- | <- Shenan -> | -- | The information is provided "as is", it is suggested you research for | yourself before you take any advice - you are the one ultimately | responsible for your actions/problems/solutions. Know what you are | getting into before you jump in with both feet. | |
- Next message: Jim Macklin: "Re: Top of the line hardware?"
- Previous message: Bob Harris: "Re: After Defrag, Win XP External Drive all of the sudden has I/O error, and I cannot access it"
- In reply to: Shenan Stanley: "Re: Upgrading processor or motherboard better?"
- Next in thread: *vik*: "Re: Upgrading processor or motherboard better?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|