Re: IDE Channels
From: francis gérard (spam_at_spamcop.net)
Date: 08/28/04
- Previous message: NoNoBadDog!: "Re: IDE Channels"
- In reply to: NoNoBadDog!: "Re: IDE Channels"
- Next in thread: francis gérard: "Re: IDE Channels"
- Reply: francis gérard: "Re: IDE Channels"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 16:40:15 -0400
"NoNoBadDog!" <mypants_bjsledgeATpixi.com> wrote in message
news:uM4J14TjEHA.2696@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Cari offers one solution, however I would recommend both HDD on the
> Primary, with the fastest as Master, and the Opticals on the Secondary,
> with the fastest as primary. Most Optical drives are DMA 2 or DMA3, while
> most HDD are DMA5. The transfer rates will suffer if the drives are mixed
> on the IDE channels. A simple HDD tach utility will confirm this. On
> most modern motherboards, it is the recommended procedure to Put HDD with
> HDD and Optical with Optical. This will optimize date rates per IDE
> channel.
bobby, this is no longer true with modern chipsets, it *was* true with older
mainboards that mixed-mode devices on the same IDE channel would be limited
to the speed of the slowest device on the channel, but that is now in the
past, and has been for some time.
-- francis
- Previous message: NoNoBadDog!: "Re: IDE Channels"
- In reply to: NoNoBadDog!: "Re: IDE Channels"
- Next in thread: francis gérard: "Re: IDE Channels"
- Reply: francis gérard: "Re: IDE Channels"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|