Re: Terayon TJ715 and XP Local Area Connections

From: Frank (bbunny_at_bqik.net)
Date: 08/20/04


Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 19:49:14 -0400

What is your reasoning behind this statement. I don't turn of a
firewall
and I don't have problems. The right answer to the wrong question
does
not make sense to me. Terayon is to broadband what an accelerator is
to dial-up.....nothing....

"Bob I" <birelan@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:412628F8.1040405@yahoo.com...
> Did you turn off the firewall?
>
> David Halpern wrote:
>
>> Anyone know the procedure to integrate to Local Area Connections
>> into one?
>>
>> It is adding the Terayon in one Local Area Connection
>> and Intel(R) PRO/100 VE Network Connection in the other.
>>
>> The Intel PRO/100 VE is sending packets but receiving none.
>>
>> Thanks all in advance.
>>
>> D.H.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: cisco 1600
    ... Ask your "guru" to justify his reasoning. ... installed firewal is worse than no firewall> With out a firewall, ... Network person had some trouble ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls that generate new packets..
    ... I've addressed the MITM and DOS issues. ... and I have presented my reasoning. ... Any firewall that does not depend on ... tcp sequence #s make a difference. ...
    (Firewall-Wizards)
  • Re: Problem with Samba and iptables
    ... Nada Lada wrote: ... >> Either way your firewall will allow incoming packets destined for the ... >> broadcast address. ... > If I'm following your reasoning, where I originally have the source as ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • Re: Router vs. desktop firewall
    ... Mark Adams writes: ... > need to enable a firewall at the desktops? ... > understand the reasoning behind either position. ...
    (comp.security.misc)