Re: Any better Hard disk imaging software than Norton Ghost2003??
From: dmac (dmacleo_at_tds1.net)
Date: 06/01/04
- Next message: Michael~*~M$FT: "Hard Drive not showing up in My Computer"
- Previous message: Yves Leclerc: "Re: 2 graphics cards/4 monitors ?"
- In reply to: Art: "Re: Any better Hard disk imaging software than Norton Ghost2003??"
- Next in thread: Philip Herlihy: "Re: Any better Hard disk imaging software than Norton Ghost2003??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 18:54:31 -0400
I had no luck even with the update with single sata, but I have heard some
say it works and some say no.
I just added the switch to boot disk to always make sure it works, but now
on raid setup its really needed.
I really am quite pleased with ghost, but have never tried anything other
than the powerquest software that came with my partition magic. I tried that
once with BAD luck (I am sure I did something wrong) and just stayed with
ghost.
-- ----------------------- dmac dmacleo@tds1.net remove 1 to mail Ati 9800pro 256 P4 2.8 @ 3.1 1gb ddr466 twin seagate 120 sata raid 0 "Art" <notaname@notanisp> wrote in message news:OQWsXxASEHA.2404@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > Hi: > I'm aware that issues have arisen with respect to using Ghost with Serial > ATA drives. I've had no direct experience in this area since up to now all > my experience with using the Ghost cloning program has been with PATA > drives. In a review of imaging programs related to SATA drives, an article > in the May, 2004 issue of Maximum PC (p. 68) indicated that they did have > problems using Ghost with SATA drives. They stated that they were informed > by Symantec that the latest version of Ghost avoids this problem. I queried > Symantec about this and here is their response of 4-27-04: > > "Thank you for contacting Symantec Online Technical Support. > > Ghost works fine with SATA drive if you first run LiveUpdate after the > initial installation. Even prior to the update there were switches that > could be used to change the drive detection method that the BIOS feeds Ghost > about SATA drives that would resolve the issue. > > SATA drives were not mainstream when Ghost was created. SATA drives have > not really become mainstream until around 6-8 months ago. Symantec creates > updates for Ghost to gain compatibility with new hardware configurations as > they become available to the public. The Maximum PC (magazine) was about 3 > months late posting that article. > > Please take note: Ghost is not supported in a RAID environment. If you are > using SATA drives through a RAID controller it very well may have adverse > effects." > > For the moment, I'll take them at their word since I've had no experience > cloning SATA drives. > > Art > > "dmac" <dmacleo@tds1.net> wrote in message > news:eMPYgo$REHA.3016@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > > a lot of problems had arisen from sata drives being used w/o command line > > switch, and symantec themselves have said (in dec 2003) they will not > offer > > a way to directly use gui w/o a command line switch. I have found -noide > to > > work best in the command line. I asked symantec why they did not plan on > > fixing this since sata is becoming so popular and got no response. > > > > -- > > ----------------------- > > dmac > > dmacleo@tds1.net > > remove 1 to mail > > Ati 9800pro 256 > > P4 2.8 @ 3.1 1gb ddr466 > > twin seagate 120 sata raid 0 > > > > > > > > > > "Art" <notaname@notanisp> wrote in message > > news:eLVxnc%23REHA.2704@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > > Hi Joe: > > > > > > I find your comments very puzzling. As I mentioned in my previous > posting, > > > over the past three years or so that I've used Ghost to clone hard > drives, > > > I've cloned these drives on a multitude of different systems. > > Interestingly > > > enough, the most common motherboard in these systems was an ASUS. I've > > > probably cloned drives in systems with a variety of ASUS motherboards at > > > least a couple of hundred times. And I can't remember the last time I > had > > a > > > problem doing so. I've discussed this with a number of persons who also > > have > > > been using Ghost over the years and their experiences parallel mine. > > > > > > I don't dispute the fact that you have experienced problems using the > > Ghost > > > program with ASUS motherboards. If you've experienced that problem, then > > > you've experienced that problem. I can only relate my positive > experiences > > > with the Ghost program along with the similarly positive experiences of > > > others using the program - computer users who I know to be competent > > users. > > > > > > Art > > > > > > > > > "Joe M" <joematminemandotcom> wrote in message > > > news:er6Zew5REHA.1276@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > > > Hi Art, > > > > When ghost works, it really works well. But when it fails, > > you'll > > > > really need another piece of cloning software. > > > > I have use Ghost 2003 to clone many types of Computer systems with > > > different > > > > motherboards (about 100 different motherboards). > > > > I've have discovered it to normally fail on the ones with an ASUS > > > > motherboard. The Ghost boot disk will boot to the point of where it > > will > > > > launch GHOST.EXE, but it is at this point that it stopped launching > the > > > GUI > > > > . > > > > What is the problem, and why often on certain Asus motherboard( the > > > biggest > > > > motherboard maker in the world)?? > > > > Maybe you have use ghost on the same make of computer for all these > > years. > > > > Yeah I know when it works it works very well. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Art" <notaname@notanisp> wrote in message > > > > news:uDiX9v4REHA.1048@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > > > > > "Joe M" <joematminemandotcom> wrote in message > > > > > news:u2tkCi3REHA.1160@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > > > > > Does anyone knows of any other better Operating System > > cloning/imaging > > > > > > software than Symantec Norton Ghost2003? In the past there was > > > > Imagequest, > > > > > > but now they're bought by Symantec too. > > > > > > I need another imaging software because on some computers ghost > > > doesn't > > > > > seem > > > > > > to work because of the hardware components. Maybe having another > > > imaging > > > > > > software will solve the problem. > > > > > > > > >Hi: > > >I am constantly puzzled by the continuous negative comments (and > > > frequent misinformation!) I come across on the various newsgroups that > > > deprecate Symantec's Norton Ghost program. My experience with that > program has > > > been, and continues to be, completely counter to the negative views > > > expressed by so many posters. I have often remarked that I wish every > software > > > program I use was as simple, straightforward, and effective as the > Norton Ghost > > > program. > > > > Let me state at the outset that I use Ghost for one and only > > > one purpose - to clone the contents of one hard drive to another. By > > > making a bit-for-bit copy (not technically precise perhaps, but correct > for all > > > practical purposes) of one's working hard drive, you have, what seems > > > to me, the ultimate backup system. I have used various versions of Ghost > over > > > the years, including the present 2003 version. During that time I > estimate > > > I've cloned various hard drives more than a thousand times. And done so > > > with nary a hiccup. Ghost's ease of use together with reasonable speed > make it a > > > joy to use. > > > > I'm aware that many experienced and competent users who contribute to > > > this newsgroup prefer different software cloning programs, e.g., Acronis > > > True Image, BING, and Casper XP among them, as well as cloning utilities > > > provided by the hard drive manufacturers. No doubt these programs work > equally > > > as well as Ghost, however, since my experience has been primarily with > > > the Ghost program, I will confine my remarks to that program. > > > > As I've previously indicated, I use Ghost exclusively to clone one > > > hard drive to another. I rarely clone individual partitions, although > > > there's no reason why you cannot do so. I'm not a particular fan of > creating hard > > > drive partitions since I frequently find them awkward to use; they seem > to > > > result in more problems than they solve; and they give the user a false > sense of > > > security. In nearly all cases I set up my computers with a single > partition > > > per hard drive. My computers are usually configured with two removable > > > hard drives in their mobile racks. I have found this arrangement just > about > > > the best backup system for the average home user and even small business > > > owner. There are other advantages in having two removable hard drives on > > >one's computer but the most significant one is providing a near fail-safe > > > backup system. The speed, flexibility and peace of mind you get with > this > > > arrangement far outweighs the relatively small additional cost of > equipping > > > one's desktop computer with this hardware configuration. Note that the > > > removable hard drive mobile racks I am referring to are designed to be > > > installed in desktop computers and not laptop or notebook computers. > > > The size, weight, and design considerations of laptops/notebooks do not > > > allow for this hardware configuration. > > > > I use the Ghost bootable floppy, rather than Ghost's Window's > > > interface when I clone the drives. I find the floppy easier and more > straightforward > > > to use, and the portability aspect of the floppy is an important > consideration for me. > > > The floppy is created through the Ghost Utilities program. It is simple > to use and effective in its operation. > > > > Cloning one's hard drive will not solve any problems the user may be > experiencing with that drive. > > > I mention this because I sometimes come across users who have run into > problems with the Ghost > > > cloning process when I later learn that the source disk was defective in > one way or another. If you > > > clone garbage, garbage is what you'll get. Before cloning a hard drive > you must ensure that the drive > > > is free of physical/system defects and virus-free. > > > > If you do install the Ghost 2003 program on your computer, check the > > > version. The latest version as of this date is 2003.793. If necessary, > > > use Ghost's built-in LiveUpdate feature to update to the latest version. > > > BTW, there had been a problem with Ghost cloning to an USB 2.0 external > > > hard drive, however, Symantec has released two revised files that > overcome > > > this problem. You can download and install the two revised files from: > > > > http://service1.symantec.com/support/ghost.nsf/docid/2003011609192825?Open&src=w. > > > (I'm not absolutely certain these two revised files are actually needed > if you have the latest 2003.793 version. > > > > > > Art > >
- Next message: Michael~*~M$FT: "Hard Drive not showing up in My Computer"
- Previous message: Yves Leclerc: "Re: 2 graphics cards/4 monitors ?"
- In reply to: Art: "Re: Any better Hard disk imaging software than Norton Ghost2003??"
- Next in thread: Philip Herlihy: "Re: Any better Hard disk imaging software than Norton Ghost2003??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|