Re: Any better Hard disk imaging software than Norton Ghost2003??
From: dmac (dmacleo_at_tds1.net)
Date: 06/01/04
- Next message: Jason Bibeau: "USB Mouse Not Working After Running Win Update"
- Previous message: mich: "fault and solution finding"
- In reply to: Art: "Re: Any better Hard disk imaging software than Norton Ghost2003??"
- Next in thread: Art: "Re: Any better Hard disk imaging software than Norton Ghost2003??"
- Reply: Art: "Re: Any better Hard disk imaging software than Norton Ghost2003??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:01:38 -0400
a lot of problems had arisen from sata drives being used w/o command line
switch, and symantec themselves have said (in dec 2003) they will not offer
a way to directly use gui w/o a command line switch. I have found -noide to
work best in the command line. I asked symantec why they did not plan on
fixing this since sata is becoming so popular and got no response.
-- ----------------------- dmac dmacleo@tds1.net remove 1 to mail Ati 9800pro 256 P4 2.8 @ 3.1 1gb ddr466 twin seagate 120 sata raid 0 "Art" <notaname@notanisp> wrote in message news:eLVxnc%23REHA.2704@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > Hi Joe: > > I find your comments very puzzling. As I mentioned in my previous posting, > over the past three years or so that I've used Ghost to clone hard drives, > I've cloned these drives on a multitude of different systems. Interestingly > enough, the most common motherboard in these systems was an ASUS. I've > probably cloned drives in systems with a variety of ASUS motherboards at > least a couple of hundred times. And I can't remember the last time I had a > problem doing so. I've discussed this with a number of persons who also have > been using Ghost over the years and their experiences parallel mine. > > I don't dispute the fact that you have experienced problems using the Ghost > program with ASUS motherboards. If you've experienced that problem, then > you've experienced that problem. I can only relate my positive experiences > with the Ghost program along with the similarly positive experiences of > others using the program - computer users who I know to be competent users. > > Art > > > "Joe M" <joematminemandotcom> wrote in message > news:er6Zew5REHA.1276@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > Hi Art, > > When ghost works, it really works well. But when it fails, you'll > > really need another piece of cloning software. > > I have use Ghost 2003 to clone many types of Computer systems with > different > > motherboards (about 100 different motherboards). > > I've have discovered it to normally fail on the ones with an ASUS > > motherboard. The Ghost boot disk will boot to the point of where it will > > launch GHOST.EXE, but it is at this point that it stopped launching the > GUI > > . > > What is the problem, and why often on certain Asus motherboard( the > biggest > > motherboard maker in the world)?? > > Maybe you have use ghost on the same make of computer for all these years. > > Yeah I know when it works it works very well. > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > "Art" <notaname@notanisp> wrote in message > > news:uDiX9v4REHA.1048@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > > > "Joe M" <joematminemandotcom> wrote in message > > > news:u2tkCi3REHA.1160@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > > > Does anyone knows of any other better Operating System cloning/imaging > > > > software than Symantec Norton Ghost2003? In the past there was > > Imagequest, > > > > but now they're bought by Symantec too. > > > > I need another imaging software because on some computers ghost > doesn't > > > seem > > > > to work because of the hardware components. Maybe having another > imaging > > > > software will solve the problem. > > > > > > Hi: > > > I am constantly puzzled by the continuous negative comments (and > frequent > > > misinformation!) I come across on the various newsgroups that deprecate > > > Symantec's Norton Ghost program. My experience with that program has > been, > > > and continues to be, completely counter to the negative views expressed > by > > > so many posters. I have often remarked that I wish every software > program > > I > > > use was as simple, straightforward, and effective as the Norton Ghost > > > program. Let me state at the outset that I use Ghost for one and only > one > > > purpose - to clone the contents of one hard drive to another. By making > a > > > bit-for-bit copy (not technically precise perhaps, but correct for all > > > practical purposes) of one's working hard drive, you have, what seems to > > me, > > > the ultimate backup system. I have used various versions of Ghost over > the > > > years, including the present 2003 version. During that time I estimate > > I've > > > cloned various hard drives more than a thousand times. And done so with > > nary > > > a hiccup. Ghost's ease of use together with reasonable speed make it a > joy > > > to use. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm aware that many experienced and competent users who contribute to > this > > > newsgroup prefer different software cloning programs, e.g., Acronis True > > > Image, BING, and Casper XP among them, as well as cloning utilities > > provided > > > by the hard drive manufacturers. No doubt these programs work equally as > > > well as Ghost, however, since my experience has been primarily with the > > > Ghost program, I will confine my remarks to that program. > > > > > > > > > > > > As I've previously indicated, I use Ghost exclusively to clone one hard > > > drive to another. I rarely clone individual partitions, although there's > > no > > > reason why you cannot do so. I'm not a particular fan of creating hard > > drive > > > partitions since I frequently find them awkward to use; they seem to > > create > > > more problems than they solve; and they give the user a false sense of > > > security. In nearly all cases I set up my computers with a single > > partition > > > per hard drive. My computers are usually configured with two removable > > hard > > > drives in their mobile racks. I have found this arrangement just about > the > > > best backup system for the average home user and even small business > > owner. > > > There are other advantages in having two removable hard drives on one's > > > computer but the most significant one is providing a near fail-safe > backup > > > system. The speed, flexibility and peace of mind you get with this > > > arrangement far outweighs the relatively small additional cost of > > equipping > > > one's desktop computer with this hardware configuration. Note that the > > > removable hard drive mobile racks I am referring to are designed to be > > > installed in desktop computers and not laptop or notebook computers. The > > > size, weight, and design considerations of laptops/notebooks do not > allow > > > for this hardware configuration. > > > > > > > > > > > > I use the Ghost bootable floppy, rather than Ghost's Window's interface > > when > > > I clone the drives. I find the floppy easier and more straightforward to > > > use, and the portability aspect of the floppy is an important > > consideration > > > for me. The floppy is created through the Ghost Utilities program. It is > > > simple to use and effective in its operation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cloning one's hard drive will not solve any problems the user may be > > > experiencing with that drive. I mention this because I sometimes come > > across > > > users who have run into problems with the Ghost cloning process when I > > later > > > learn that the source disk was defective in one way or another. If you > > clone > > > garbage, garbage is what you'll get. Before cloning a hard drive you > must > > > ensure that the drive is free of physical/system defects and virus-free. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you do install the Ghost 2003 program on your computer, check the > > > version. The latest version as of this date is 2003.793. If necessary, > use > > > Ghost's built-in LiveUpdate feature to update to the latest version. > BTW, > > > there had been a problem with Ghost cloning to an USB 2.0 external hard > > > drive, however, Symantec has released two revised files that overcome > this > > > problem. You can download and install the two revised files from: > > > > > > > > > http://service1.symantec.com/support/ghost.nsf/docid/2003011609192825?Open&s > > rc=w. > > > (I'm not absolutely certain these two revised files are actually needed > if > > > you have the latest 2003.793 version.) > > > > > > > > > > > > Art > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Next message: Jason Bibeau: "USB Mouse Not Working After Running Win Update"
- Previous message: mich: "fault and solution finding"
- In reply to: Art: "Re: Any better Hard disk imaging software than Norton Ghost2003??"
- Next in thread: Art: "Re: Any better Hard disk imaging software than Norton Ghost2003??"
- Reply: Art: "Re: Any better Hard disk imaging software than Norton Ghost2003??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|