Re: Pentium vs Celeron
From: cquirke (MVP Win9x) (cquirkenews_at_nospam.mvps.org)
Date: 03/29/04
- Next message: Shenan Stanley: "Re: Monitor "Out Of Frequency""
- Previous message: Paul: "Monitor "Out Of Frequency""
- In reply to: MacKenrick: "Re: Pentium vs Celeron"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:13:40 +0200
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 16:03:22 -0800, "MacKenrick"
>"Bottom-line , the Celeron is fine for surfing and word-processing, but
>for big databases, spreadsheets and multimedia, the P4 will out perform
>by a strong margin."
That hasn't been my experience, I have to tell you. Modern systems
eat yesterday's hero apps (CAD, spreadsheets, multimedia, databases)
for breakfast and I don't see Pentium making a big difference there.
Serving a database to multiple PCs making unrelated requests; that may
be a different matter, as would be the *creation* of multimedia.
Those applications require more thought throughout the system; perhaps
SCSI for the server, xIDE RAID for the latter's workspace, and boss
RAM for both (served on an up-to-speed motherboard chipset).
On AMD vs. Intel; I don't see that as a processor decision, but as a
platform decision. I go Intel because I don't trust SiS or VIA, and
don't know enough about nVidia's motherboard chipsets to make a stand
on them. A bad chipset can make life hell! If it were the old
Socket7 days, I might be building AMD processors on Intel chipsets :-)
>-------------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -
Running Windows-based av to kill active malware is like striking
a match to see if what you are standing in is water or petrol.
>-------------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -
- Next message: Shenan Stanley: "Re: Monitor "Out Of Frequency""
- Previous message: Paul: "Monitor "Out Of Frequency""
- In reply to: MacKenrick: "Re: Pentium vs Celeron"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]