Re: Windows 98, 2000, or XP
From: Bruce Chambers (bchambers_at_nospamcableone.net)
Date: 03/13/04
- Next message: Bruce Chambers: "Re: Conversion from FAT32 to NTFS in XP"
- Previous message: Bruce Chambers: "Re: XP upgrade: FAT32 to NTFS"
- In reply to: James: "Windows 98, 2000, or XP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:21:19 -0700
Greetings --
Win98 or WinNT. You haven't enough processing power or RAM, even
though you exceed the minimum requirements, to get decent performance
from Win2K or WinXP.
Bruce Chambers
-- Help us help you: http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having both at once. -- RAH "James" <Homer@jamco> wrote in message news:Oo$gblECEHA.3400@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > Hey, I have an intel Celeron 400mhz with 96megs of ram. > I need to know what version of windows would run best on this > computer, 98, > 2000, or XP. > > It will basically just be used for word documents and email. > > Thanks > >
- Next message: Bruce Chambers: "Re: Conversion from FAT32 to NTFS in XP"
- Previous message: Bruce Chambers: "Re: XP upgrade: FAT32 to NTFS"
- In reply to: James: "Windows 98, 2000, or XP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|